Belatacept Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) to Clinical Outcomes and Compared With Reported BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Belatacept (BELA) pharmacokinetic (PK) studies informed dosing strategies used in phase 3 studies, where fixed mg/kg dosing compared a less intensive (LI) and more intensive (MI) regimen. The LI regimen was preferred due to a better risk/benefit profile. We compared PK parameters observed in the BELA Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) with previous reports. BELA trough samples were analyzed using a validated quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay. Clearance (CL) was estimated with Bayesian estimation using a published BELA population PK model. Significantly higher CL was observed in subjects <60 years old and African American (AA) patients, leading to decreased BELA exposure. No differences in allometrically scaled CL were observed by BMI or sex; however, overall BELA exposure was greater in males. There were no differences in exposure in subjects with rejection; however, subjects with infection had significantly higher exposure. BELA PK was not different between alemtuzumab and rabbit-antithymocyte globulin induction groups without steroids, but overall drug exposure was higher than previously reported in trials co-administering with basiliximab and steroids. Future studies to optimize BELA dosing strategies are warranted as BELA exposure in this analysis exceeded Phase 3 target thresholds. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01729494.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Transplantation
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70172
Primary Topic
Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Belatacept Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) to Clinical Outcomes and Compared With Reported BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT Pharmacokinetic Analysis

John P. Leone, Rita R. Alloway, Arthur J. Matas, Tomoyuki Mizuno et al.
Clinical Transplantation
Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
article

Belatacept Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) to Clinical Outcomes and Compared With Reported BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT Pharmacokinetic Analysis

John P. Leone, Rita R. Alloway, Arthur J. Matas, Tomoyuki Mizuno, Bradley Miyagawa, Dixon B. Kaufman, E. Steve Woodle, Adele R. Shields, Alexander A. Vinks, Patricia West‐Thielke, Ryota Tanaka, Alexander C. Wiseman, Annette Christianson, Melissa McGowan, Alexandra Pyatt
article en

Abstract

Belatacept (BELA) pharmacokinetic (PK) studies informed dosing strategies used in phase 3 studies, where fixed mg/kg dosing compared a less intensive (LI) and more intensive (MI) regimen. The LI regimen was preferred due to a better risk/benefit profile. We compared PK parameters observed in the BELA Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) with previous reports. BELA trough samples were analyzed using a validated quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay. Clearance (CL) was estimated with Bayesian estimation using a published BELA population PK model. Significantly higher CL was observed in subjects <60 years old and African American (AA) patients, leading to decreased BELA exposure. No differences in allometrically scaled CL were observed by BMI or sex; however, overall BELA exposure was greater in males. There were no differences in exposure in subjects with rejection; however, subjects with infection had significantly higher exposure. BELA PK was not different between alemtuzumab and rabbit-antithymocyte globulin induction groups without steroids, but overall drug exposure was higher than previously reported in trials co-administering with basiliximab and steroids. Future studies to optimize BELA dosing strategies are warranted as BELA exposure in this analysis exceeded Phase 3 target thresholds. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01729494.

Clinical TransplantationVol. 39(8)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), University of Minnesota (US), University of Wisconsin System (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Tampa General Hospital (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Indo-American Center (US), Adventist Heart Institute (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Dialysis Clinics
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.