Adverse Consequences from Intimate Partner Violence and Mothers’ and Fathers’ Supportive Parenting

Supportive parenting can protect children who have been exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) from developing adjustment problems, and there is evidence suggesting that supportive parenting increases under certain circumstances after IPV. However, research on IPV and supportive parenting focuses almost exclusively on parenting by mothers, and there is very little research examining the circumstances in which experiencing IPV (i.e., victimization) bolsters supportive parenting. The present research addresses these gaps. Participants included 397 families (mothers, fathers, and children). Mothers and fathers reported on experiences of IPV, whether they experienced adverse consequences from IPV (physical injury and fear), and supportive parenting. Children reported on their mothers' and fathers' supportive parenting. Results indicated that adverse consequences from IPV (i.e., physical injury and fear) were more common among mothers than fathers. Additionally, adverse consequences moderated the association between the frequency of experiencing IPV and both parents' self-reports of supportive parenting; for both mothers and fathers, when adverse consequences were reported, IPV experiences were associated with more supportive parenting. In the absence of adverse consequences, IPV experiences were associated with less supportive parenting. Adverse consequences also moderated the association between IPV experiences and child reports of fathers' supportive parenting. Again, when fathers reported experiencing adverse consequences of IPV, fathers' IPV experiences were associated with more supportive parenting. The findings underscore the complex relations between experiencing IPV and supportive parenting and suggest that both mothers' and fathers' adverse experiences from IPV may lead to increases in supportive parenting. These results highlight the importance of recognizing the nuanced ways that adversity may activate protective parenting responses and underscore the potential utility of parenting programs to consider both mothers' and fathers' parenting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251355629
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adverse Consequences from Intimate Partner Violence and Mothers’ and Fathers’ Supportive Parenting

Alison Krauss, Caitlin Rancher, Ernest N. Jouriles, Renée McDonald
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Adverse Consequences from Intimate Partner Violence and Mothers’ and Fathers’ Supportive Parenting

Alison Krauss, Caitlin Rancher, Ernest N. Jouriles, Renée McDonald
article en

Abstract

Supportive parenting can protect children who have been exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) from developing adjustment problems, and there is evidence suggesting that supportive parenting increases under certain circumstances after IPV. However, research on IPV and supportive parenting focuses almost exclusively on parenting by mothers, and there is very little research examining the circumstances in which experiencing IPV (i.e., victimization) bolsters supportive parenting. The present research addresses these gaps. Participants included 397 families (mothers, fathers, and children). Mothers and fathers reported on experiences of IPV, whether they experienced adverse consequences from IPV (physical injury and fear), and supportive parenting. Children reported on their mothers' and fathers' supportive parenting. Results indicated that adverse consequences from IPV (i.e., physical injury and fear) were more common among mothers than fathers. Additionally, adverse consequences moderated the association between the frequency of experiencing IPV and both parents' self-reports of supportive parenting; for both mothers and fathers, when adverse consequences were reported, IPV experiences were associated with more supportive parenting. In the absence of adverse consequences, IPV experiences were associated with less supportive parenting. Adverse consequences also moderated the association between IPV experiences and child reports of fathers' supportive parenting. Again, when fathers reported experiencing adverse consequences of IPV, fathers' IPV experiences were associated with more supportive parenting. The findings underscore the complex relations between experiencing IPV and supportive parenting and suggest that both mothers' and fathers' adverse experiences from IPV may lead to increases in supportive parenting. These results highlight the importance of recognizing the nuanced ways that adversity may activate protective parenting responses and underscore the potential utility of parenting programs to consider both mothers' and fathers' parenting.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Southern Methodist University (US), Doris Miller Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (US), Central Texas Veterans Health Care System (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.