Correlation of Mechanical Thresholds, Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale, and Sharp and Wheeler Grading Scale in Dogs with Acute Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusions

In dogs with intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE), the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale-Short Form (GCMPS) and the Sharp and Wheeler Grading Scale (SWGS) are routinely used in the evaluation of pain (GCMPS) and neurological function (SWGS). Additionally, quantitative sensory tests (QSTs) are increasingly being incorporated into veterinary clinical practice for pain characterisation. The aim was to investigate a possible relationship between the GCMPS, the SWGS, and mechanical thresholds (MTs) in 31 client-owned dogs with thoracolumbar IVDEs. Dogs were always assessed in the same order, starting with pain rating using the GCMPS, followed by classifying neurological severity using the SWGS, before determining MTs using a handheld pressure algometer. Dogs were evaluated over a five-day testing period (before surgery and on days one, two, three, and ten after surgery). The GCMPS and the SWGS data remained consistent across all days of testing. No statistically significant correlation or difference was observed between the scores. MTs showed a significant negative correlation with the GCMPS (r = -0.311; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a positive one with the SWGS (r = 0.282; <i>p</i> = 0.002). The GCMPS and MTs showed a slight divergence in their progression. MTs might be more sensitive than GCMPS in reflecting clinical improvement and should be considered for clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152176
Primary Topic
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation of Mechanical Thresholds, Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale, and Sharp and Wheeler Grading Scale in Dogs with Acute Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusions

Sebastian Meller, A F Schütter, Holger A. Volk, Sabine Kästner et al.
Animals
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
article

Correlation of Mechanical Thresholds, Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale, and Sharp and Wheeler Grading Scale in Dogs with Acute Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusions

Sebastian Meller, A F Schütter, Holger A. Volk, Sabine Kästner, Jacqueline Hölscher
article en

Abstract

In dogs with intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE), the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale-Short Form (GCMPS) and the Sharp and Wheeler Grading Scale (SWGS) are routinely used in the evaluation of pain (GCMPS) and neurological function (SWGS). Additionally, quantitative sensory tests (QSTs) are increasingly being incorporated into veterinary clinical practice for pain characterisation. The aim was to investigate a possible relationship between the GCMPS, the SWGS, and mechanical thresholds (MTs) in 31 client-owned dogs with thoracolumbar IVDEs. Dogs were always assessed in the same order, starting with pain rating using the GCMPS, followed by classifying neurological severity using the SWGS, before determining MTs using a handheld pressure algometer. Dogs were evaluated over a five-day testing period (before surgery and on days one, two, three, and ten after surgery). The GCMPS and the SWGS data remained consistent across all days of testing. No statistically significant correlation or difference was observed between the scores. MTs showed a significant negative correlation with the GCMPS (r = -0.311; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a positive one with the SWGS (r = 0.282; <i>p</i> = 0.002). The GCMPS and MTs showed a slight divergence in their progression. MTs might be more sensitive than GCMPS in reflecting clinical improvement and should be considered for clinical practice.

AnimalsVol. 15(15)
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE), Hannover Re (Germany) (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.