Open, Small, Rigmarole – Evaluating Llama 3.2 3B’s Feedback for Programming Exercises

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been subject to extensive research in the past few years. This is particularly true for the potential of LLMs to generate formative programming feedback for novice learners at university. In contrast to Generative AI (GenAI) tools based on LLMs, such as GPT, smaller and open models have received much less attention. Yet, they offer several benefits, as educators can let them run on a virtual machine or personal computer. This can help circumvent some major concerns applicable to other GenAI tools and LLMs (e.g., data protection, lack of control over changes, privacy). Therefore, this study explores the feedback characteristics of the open, lightweight LLM Llama 3.2 (3B). In particular, we investigate the models’ responses to authentic student solutions to introductory programming exercises written in Java. The generated output is qualitatively analyzed to help evaluate the feedback’s quality, content, structure, and other features. The results provide a comprehensive overview of the feedback capabilities and serious shortcomings of this open, small LLM. We further discuss the findings in the context of previous research on LLMs and contribute to benchmarking recently available GenAI tools and their feedback for novice learners of programming. Thereby, this work has implications for educators, learners, and tool developers attempting to utilize all variants of LLMs (including open and small models) to generate formative feedback and support learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v15i5.55359
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open, Small, Rigmarole – Evaluating Llama 3.2 3B’s Feedback for Programming Exercises

Natalie Kiesler, Sven Strickroth, Imen Azaiz, Anni Zhang
1 citations
International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)
Teaching and Learning Programming
1.69
article

Open, Small, Rigmarole – Evaluating Llama 3.2 3B’s Feedback for Programming Exercises

Natalie Kiesler, Sven Strickroth, Imen Azaiz, Anni Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been subject to extensive research in the past few years. This is particularly true for the potential of LLMs to generate formative programming feedback for novice learners at university. In contrast to Generative AI (GenAI) tools based on LLMs, such as GPT, smaller and open models have received much less attention. Yet, they offer several benefits, as educators can let them run on a virtual machine or personal computer. This can help circumvent some major concerns applicable to other GenAI tools and LLMs (e.g., data protection, lack of control over changes, privacy). Therefore, this study explores the feedback characteristics of the open, lightweight LLM Llama 3.2 (3B). In particular, we investigate the models’ responses to authentic student solutions to introductory programming exercises written in Java. The generated output is qualitatively analyzed to help evaluate the feedback’s quality, content, structure, and other features. The results provide a comprehensive overview of the feedback capabilities and serious shortcomings of this open, small LLM. We further discuss the findings in the context of previous research on LLMs and contribute to benchmarking recently available GenAI tools and their feedback for novice learners of programming. Thereby, this work has implications for educators, learners, and tool developers attempting to utilize all variants of LLMs (including open and small models) to generate formative feedback and support learning.

International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)Vol. 15(5)
LMU Klinikum (DE), Georg Simon Ohm University of Applied Sciences Nuremberg (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Teaching and Learning Programming
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Open, Small, Rigmarole – Evaluating Llama 3.2 3B’s Feedback for Programming Exercises — Natalie Kiesler, Sven Strickroth, et al. · International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS