Reduction in Earth’s carbon budget imbalance

The Global Carbon Project (GCP) compiles an updated global carbon budget each year, synthesizing state‑of‑the‑art estimates of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, land and ocean sinks, and the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> growth rate. The residual between these terms, referred to as the global carbon budget imbalance, reflects the aggregate inaccuracies of the individual component estimates. Growth rates derived from marine boundary layer (MBL) surface flask mixing ratio observations are assumed to be highly accurate. Hence, land and ocean sink estimates from process models are viewed as the primary source of the imbalance. Here we show that substantial discrepancies arise when marine boundary layer growth rate estimates are used to represent the whole atmosphere. Correcting for this discrepancy using atmospheric flux inversion estimates reduces the 0.76 petagrams of carbon per year (PgC yr<sup>-1</sup>) root-mean-square (RMS) imbalance (from the 2023 GCP report) by up to 25%. Further investigation into the imbalance metric between the 2017 and 2023 GCP reports shows a reduction in imbalance resulting from updates to each carbon budget component, leading to a 16% overall reduction. These reductions provide quantitative evidence of improvements in process models and inventory emission estimates, driven by enhanced forcing data and the inclusion of new carbon cycle processes. Overall, we report a 37% reduction in the root-mean-square imbalance, from 0.91 to 0.57 PgC yr<sup>-1</sup>, between the 2017 and 2023 GCP reports by combining process model and inventory improvements with atmospheric growth rate corrections. Our findings indicate that land and ocean process models are more accurate than previously believed and that the scientific understanding of Earth's carbon cycle is improving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-61588-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reduction in Earth’s carbon budget imbalance

Frédéric Chevallier, Brendan Keith Aidan Byrne, Christian Rödenbeck, Christian Frankenberg et al.
1 citations
Nature Communications
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
article

Reduction in Earth’s carbon budget imbalance

Frédéric Chevallier, Brendan Keith Aidan Byrne, Christian Rödenbeck, Christian Frankenberg, Abhishek Chatterjee, Sudhanshu Pandey, Junjie Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Global Carbon Project (GCP) compiles an updated global carbon budget each year, synthesizing state‑of‑the‑art estimates of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, land and ocean sinks, and the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> growth rate. The residual between these terms, referred to as the global carbon budget imbalance, reflects the aggregate inaccuracies of the individual component estimates. Growth rates derived from marine boundary layer (MBL) surface flask mixing ratio observations are assumed to be highly accurate. Hence, land and ocean sink estimates from process models are viewed as the primary source of the imbalance. Here we show that substantial discrepancies arise when marine boundary layer growth rate estimates are used to represent the whole atmosphere. Correcting for this discrepancy using atmospheric flux inversion estimates reduces the 0.76 petagrams of carbon per year (PgC yr<sup>-1</sup>) root-mean-square (RMS) imbalance (from the 2023 GCP report) by up to 25%. Further investigation into the imbalance metric between the 2017 and 2023 GCP reports shows a reduction in imbalance resulting from updates to each carbon budget component, leading to a 16% overall reduction. These reductions provide quantitative evidence of improvements in process models and inventory emission estimates, driven by enhanced forcing data and the inclusion of new carbon cycle processes. Overall, we report a 37% reduction in the root-mean-square imbalance, from 0.91 to 0.57 PgC yr<sup>-1</sup>, between the 2017 and 2023 GCP reports by combining process model and inventory improvements with atmospheric growth rate corrections. Our findings indicate that land and ocean process models are more accurate than previously believed and that the scientific understanding of Earth's carbon cycle is improving.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
California Institute of Technology (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.