Reliability Risks and Regulation of Algorithmic Evidence in Criminal Certification

Algorithmic evidence is the product of the deep integration of algorithm and criminal justice. In criminal proof, the reliability risk of algorithmic evidence mainly focuses on three levels: at the level of legitimacy, the definition of evidence qualification is vague, the data collection is illegal, and the algorithmic technology application program is not standardized; at the level of authenticity, the data source is biased, the algorithm is discriminatory, and the black box dilemma; and at the level of relevance, the causality is insufficient, and the predictive conclusions are easy to be mechanically applied. In this regard, the reliability of should be guaranteed through the legalization of evidence types and the traceability of data sources; the establishment of algorithmic technology visualization system and third-party verification mechanism to achieve technical reliability; and the clear logical connection between the conclusion and the facts to be proved and the setting up of manual review nodes to strengthen the logical reliability. It provides institutional and technical support for the innovation of judicial proof system in the digital era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.ht25452
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability Risks and Regulation of Algorithmic Evidence in Criminal Certification

Weitong Zhu
1 links
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Reliability Risks and Regulation of Algorithmic Evidence in Criminal Certification

Weitong Zhu
article en

Abstract

Algorithmic evidence is the product of the deep integration of algorithm and criminal justice. In criminal proof, the reliability risk of algorithmic evidence mainly focuses on three levels: at the level of legitimacy, the definition of evidence qualification is vague, the data collection is illegal, and the algorithmic technology application program is not standardized; at the level of authenticity, the data source is biased, the algorithm is discriminatory, and the black box dilemma; and at the level of relevance, the causality is insufficient, and the predictive conclusions are easy to be mechanically applied. In this regard, the reliability of should be guaranteed through the legalization of evidence types and the traceability of data sources; the establishment of algorithmic technology visualization system and third-party verification mechanism to achieve technical reliability; and the clear logical connection between the conclusion and the facts to be proved and the setting up of manual review nodes to strengthen the logical reliability. It provides institutional and technical support for the innovation of judicial proof system in the digital era.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 104(1)
North China Electric Power University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.