Leadership Uniformity in Timeout-Based Quorum Byzantine Fault Tolerance (QBFT) Consensus

This study evaluates leadership uniformity—the degree to which the proposer role is evenly distributed among validator nodes over time—in Quorum-based Byzantine Fault Tolerance (QBFT), a Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) consensus algorithm used in permissioned blockchain networks. By introducing simulated follower timeouts derived from uniform, normal, lognormal, and Weibull distributions, it models a range of network conditions and latency patterns across nodes. This approach integrates Raft-inspired timeout mechanisms into the QBFT framework, enabling a more detailed analysis of leader selection under different network conditions. Three leader selection strategies are tested: Direct selection of the node with the shortest timeout, and two quorum-based approaches selecting from the top 20% and 30% of nodes with the shortest timeouts. Simulations were conducted over 200 rounds in a 10-node network. Results show that leader selection was most equitable under the Weibull distribution with shape k=0.5, which captures delay behavior observed in real-world networks. In contrast, the uniform distribution did not consistently yield the most balanced outcomes. The findings also highlight the effectiveness of quorum-based selection: While choosing the node with the lowest timeout ensures responsiveness in each round, it does not guarantee uniform leadership over time. In low-variability distributions, certain nodes may be repeatedly selected by chance, as similar timeout values increase the likelihood of the same nodes appearing among the fastest. Incorporating controlled randomness through quorum-based voting improves rotation consistency and promotes fairer leader distribution, especially under heavy-tailed latency conditions. However, expanding the candidate pool beyond 30% (e.g., to 40% or 50%) introduced vote fragmentation, which complicated quorum formation in small networks and led to consensus failure. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of timeout-aware, quorum-based leader selection as a more adaptive and equitable alternative to round-robin approaches, and provides a foundation for developing more sophisticated QBFT variants tailored to latency-sensitive networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9080196
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership Uniformity in Timeout-Based Quorum Byzantine Fault Tolerance (QBFT) Consensus

George M. Giaglis, Stamatis Papangelou, Elias Iosif, Andreas Polyvios Delladetsimas
1 citations
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
1.49
article

Leadership Uniformity in Timeout-Based Quorum Byzantine Fault Tolerance (QBFT) Consensus

George M. Giaglis, Stamatis Papangelou, Elias Iosif, Andreas Polyvios Delladetsimas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates leadership uniformity—the degree to which the proposer role is evenly distributed among validator nodes over time—in Quorum-based Byzantine Fault Tolerance (QBFT), a Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) consensus algorithm used in permissioned blockchain networks. By introducing simulated follower timeouts derived from uniform, normal, lognormal, and Weibull distributions, it models a range of network conditions and latency patterns across nodes. This approach integrates Raft-inspired timeout mechanisms into the QBFT framework, enabling a more detailed analysis of leader selection under different network conditions. Three leader selection strategies are tested: Direct selection of the node with the shortest timeout, and two quorum-based approaches selecting from the top 20% and 30% of nodes with the shortest timeouts. Simulations were conducted over 200 rounds in a 10-node network. Results show that leader selection was most equitable under the Weibull distribution with shape k=0.5, which captures delay behavior observed in real-world networks. In contrast, the uniform distribution did not consistently yield the most balanced outcomes. The findings also highlight the effectiveness of quorum-based selection: While choosing the node with the lowest timeout ensures responsiveness in each round, it does not guarantee uniform leadership over time. In low-variability distributions, certain nodes may be repeatedly selected by chance, as similar timeout values increase the likelihood of the same nodes appearing among the fastest. Incorporating controlled randomness through quorum-based voting improves rotation consistency and promotes fairer leader distribution, especially under heavy-tailed latency conditions. However, expanding the candidate pool beyond 30% (e.g., to 40% or 50%) introduced vote fragmentation, which complicated quorum formation in small networks and led to consensus failure. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of timeout-aware, quorum-based leader selection as a more adaptive and equitable alternative to round-robin approaches, and provides a foundation for developing more sophisticated QBFT variants tailored to latency-sensitive networks.

Big Data and Cognitive ComputingVol. 9(8)
University of Nicosia (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.