Bonding Orthodontic Attachments to 3D-Printed Photosensitive Definitive Resin: An In Vitro Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The increasing clinical integration of 3D-printed definitive resins requires a comprehensive understanding of their physicochemical properties and adhesive behavior. However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal surface treatment and bonding strategies for clear aligner composite attachments on these materials. This study aimed to characterize a 3D-printed definitive resin, evaluate the effects of surface treatments on its surface topography, and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of the bonded attachments using different adhesive systems, both before and after thermocycling. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 120 rectangular specimens were fabricated from a 3D printed dental resin (Crowntec<sup>®</sup>, SAREMCO Dental AG-Mexico City, Mexico). For physicochemical characterization, six samples underwent scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis. To evaluate surface topography, 42 polished specimens were assigned to three groups: untreated (control), etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid (HFA), or sandblasted with 50 µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (AA). Each group was subdivided for SEM observation and surface roughness (<i>Ra</i>) measurement. For SBS testing, 72 additional samples received the same surface treatments and were further subdivided according to the adhesive system: Transbond™ XT Primer (TXT) or Single Bond Universal (SBU). <b>Results</b>: The AA group showed the highest <i>Ra</i> (2.21 ± 0.30 µm), followed by HFA (0.81 ± 0.20 µm) and control (0.07 ± 0.30 µm) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The highest SBS was observed in the AA + SBU group, followed by AA + TXT. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sandblasting with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles, combined with a universal adhesive, significantly improved bond strength, suggesting a viable protocol for 3D printed definitive composites in aligner attachment applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080341
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bonding Orthodontic Attachments to 3D-Printed Photosensitive Definitive Resin: An In Vitro Study

Ronaldo Câmara Cozza, Jorge Humberto Luna‐Domínguez, Carlos Roberto Luna‐Domínguez, Omaika Victoria Criollo-Barrios et al.
5 links
Dentistry Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Bonding Orthodontic Attachments to 3D-Printed Photosensitive Definitive Resin: An In Vitro Study

Ronaldo Câmara Cozza, Jorge Humberto Luna‐Domínguez, Carlos Roberto Luna‐Domínguez, Omaika Victoria Criollo-Barrios, Carlos Alberto Luna-Lara, Ricardo de Jesus Figueroa-López
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The increasing clinical integration of 3D-printed definitive resins requires a comprehensive understanding of their physicochemical properties and adhesive behavior. However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal surface treatment and bonding strategies for clear aligner composite attachments on these materials. This study aimed to characterize a 3D-printed definitive resin, evaluate the effects of surface treatments on its surface topography, and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of the bonded attachments using different adhesive systems, both before and after thermocycling. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 120 rectangular specimens were fabricated from a 3D printed dental resin (Crowntec<sup>®</sup>, SAREMCO Dental AG-Mexico City, Mexico). For physicochemical characterization, six samples underwent scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis. To evaluate surface topography, 42 polished specimens were assigned to three groups: untreated (control), etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid (HFA), or sandblasted with 50 µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (AA). Each group was subdivided for SEM observation and surface roughness (<i>Ra</i>) measurement. For SBS testing, 72 additional samples received the same surface treatments and were further subdivided according to the adhesive system: Transbond™ XT Primer (TXT) or Single Bond Universal (SBU). <b>Results</b>: The AA group showed the highest <i>Ra</i> (2.21 ± 0.30 µm), followed by HFA (0.81 ± 0.20 µm) and control (0.07 ± 0.30 µm) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The highest SBS was observed in the AA + SBU group, followed by AA + TXT. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sandblasting with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles, combined with a universal adhesive, significantly improved bond strength, suggesting a viable protocol for 3D printed definitive composites in aligner attachment applications.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(8)
Autonomous University of Tamaulipas (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.