On the International Criminal Responsibility of States

At present, the concept of international criminal responsibility lacks explicit provisions in international conventions, and scholars have developed diverse interpretations based on domestic legal frameworks. Traditional international law denies the existence of criminal responsibility for states and holds that only individuals may bear such liability; however, modern international law has incorporated this concept into the broader regime of state responsibility, thereby extending the traditional scope. Owing to political and economic disparities among states, this issue remains contentious. This paper supports the position that states can be subjects of international criminal responsibility. Through comparative analysis, it argues for both the necessity and feasibility of attributing international criminal responsibility to states, emphasizing its vital role in upholding the rule of law at the international level. The paper contends that this represents a significant legal development in the international communitys response to systemic crimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.25381
Citations
36
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the International Criminal Responsibility of States

Xin Chen
36 citations
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
International Law and Human Rights
article

On the International Criminal Responsibility of States

Xin Chen
article en
36 citations

Abstract

At present, the concept of international criminal responsibility lacks explicit provisions in international conventions, and scholars have developed diverse interpretations based on domestic legal frameworks. Traditional international law denies the existence of criminal responsibility for states and holds that only individuals may bear such liability; however, modern international law has incorporated this concept into the broader regime of state responsibility, thereby extending the traditional scope. Owing to political and economic disparities among states, this issue remains contentious. This paper supports the position that states can be subjects of international criminal responsibility. Through comparative analysis, it argues for both the necessity and feasibility of attributing international criminal responsibility to states, emphasizing its vital role in upholding the rule of law at the international level. The paper contends that this represents a significant legal development in the international communitys response to systemic crimes.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 103(1)
University of Macau (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the International Criminal Responsibility of States — Xin Chen · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS