Purifying Anaerobically Treated Municipal Secondary Wastewater Effluent by a Reverse Osmosis-Based Potable Reuse Treatment Train
As a pretreatment to potable reuse trains, anaerobic secondary treatment could reduce the energy demand and footprint compared to aerobic secondary treatment. Long-term pilot tests linked a reverse osmosis (RO)-based potable reuse treatment system to a pilot-scale staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR). A membrane-aerated bioreactor removed sulfide in SAF-MBR effluent prior to RO. The RO operated for ∼120 days at 15 LMH and 67–83% water recovery, with a final feed pressure during each cycle of ∼9–10 bar. When the final pressure increased to ∼12 bar, chemical cleaning reestablished membrane performance, and a membrane autopsy indicated reversible fouling by biomass and phosphate-based minerals. MS2 bacteriophage spiking tests indicated at least 5–6-log removal each by RO and UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process (AOP) treatment at ∼730 mJ/cm2 average UV fluence. A 1,100 mJ/cm2 average UV fluence met treatment goals for 1,4-dioxane and indicators for other organic contaminants. Halogenated DBPs in the chlorinated final effluent were ∼5-fold lower than potable reuse trains fed by aerobic secondary effluent. N-Nitrosodimethylamine was well below California’s 10 ng/L Notification Limit. An operating cost comparison indicated that a potable reuse train fed by SAF-MBR effluent ($0.69/m3) is cost-competitive to that fed by aerobic secondary effluent ($0.69/m3).
Authors
- William A. Mitch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-0938)
- Tzahi Y. Cath (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-4117)
- Jessica A. MacDonald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4048-5631)
- Benjamin Najm
Institutions
- Colorado School of Mines (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ACS ES&T Water
- Published
- 2025-07-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00535
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.80
Funders
- Bureau of Reclamation
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada