Incorporating cost considerations into shared decision-making: lessons from Bulgaria

This study aims to explore the need for and acceptability of incorporating treatment costs into shared decision-making (SDM) among patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) in Bulgaria. This study is a qualitative, non-interventional evaluation of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs, acceptability, and perceived barriers to introducing the cost dimension into SDM in routine clinical practice. The study was based on data collected through focus groups and semi-guided interviews conducted separately with both patients and HCPs. In total, the interviews involved thirteen HCPs (two oncohematologists and two hospital pharmacists; five physicians and one nurse from a multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic; and three endocrinologists), as well as eight oncological patients, six MS patients, and four diabetic patients. SDM is not a well-known concept among Bulgarian HCPs and patients. However, they use it in an unstructured manner. Both groups agreed that SDM is an important approach in mutual communication that improves treatment outcomes and enhances patient adherence. Patients who are required to make co-payments consider SDM discussions that include cost information as very important, while those whose treatment is fully reimbursed consider it less necessary. Participants agreed that digital tools supporting SDM and including the cost dimension should provide objective, evidence-based information and be validated. While digital tools can be useful in providing information, patients valued direct communication with physicians, which should not be replaced by tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacia
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.72.e159551
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incorporating cost considerations into shared decision-making: lessons from Bulgaria

François Houÿez, Maria Dimitrova, Guenka Ivanova Petrova, Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó et al.
1 citations
Pharmacia
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
2.82
article

Incorporating cost considerations into shared decision-making: lessons from Bulgaria

François Houÿez, Maria Dimitrova, Guenka Ivanova Petrova, Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó, Konstantin Tachkov, Yoana Seitaridou, Maria Kamusheva, Vera Stoeva, Teodora Chamova, B. Németh, Martin Donchev, Maya Hristozova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to explore the need for and acceptability of incorporating treatment costs into shared decision-making (SDM) among patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) in Bulgaria. This study is a qualitative, non-interventional evaluation of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs, acceptability, and perceived barriers to introducing the cost dimension into SDM in routine clinical practice. The study was based on data collected through focus groups and semi-guided interviews conducted separately with both patients and HCPs. In total, the interviews involved thirteen HCPs (two oncohematologists and two hospital pharmacists; five physicians and one nurse from a multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic; and three endocrinologists), as well as eight oncological patients, six MS patients, and four diabetic patients. SDM is not a well-known concept among Bulgarian HCPs and patients. However, they use it in an unstructured manner. Both groups agreed that SDM is an important approach in mutual communication that improves treatment outcomes and enhances patient adherence. Patients who are required to make co-payments consider SDM discussions that include cost information as very important, while those whose treatment is fully reimbursed consider it less necessary. Participants agreed that digital tools supporting SDM and including the cost dimension should provide objective, evidence-based information and be validated. While digital tools can be useful in providing information, patients valued direct communication with physicians, which should not be replaced by tools.

PharmaciaVol. 72
Alexandrovska Hospital (BG), European CanCer Organisation (BE), Medical University of Sofia (BG), National Institute of Emergency Medicine "Pirogov" (BG), Specialised Hospital for Active Treatment of Oncology (BG), Syreon Research Institute (Hungary) (HU)
European Commission, Universiteit Utrecht, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.