STATE MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: ESSENCE, CONTENT AND FEATURES

The article, based on the analysis of the latest scientific developments on the problems of public management of organizational changes in the public sector, the current and prospective regulatory framework on the specified issues, and recent practices in organizing public management of organizational changes in the public sector, considers the essence, content and features of public management of organizational changes at the current stage of development of the public service in Ukraine; the features of the development and implementation of new organizational structures in the public sector, which should ensure the provision of high-quality public services, were investigated; The theoretical foundations of building organizational structures, basic principles and approaches are defined; the main factors that should be taken into account in the process of developing an effective organizational structure in the public sphere are given; It is shown that the effective work and restoration of Ukraine in the war and post-war period requires the introduction of new organizational structures in the public sector that should ensure the provision of high-quality public services; advantages and the ability to change under the influence of external factors, which must be taken into account when developing effective organizational structures with a specific purpose; It has been proven that in order to develop and implement new organizational structures in the public sector that should ensure the provision of quality public services, the following factors should be taken into account: control over the adoption of management decisions and ensuring their implementation, technical design and support of systems and procedures, high-quality operational personnel, high-quality management and organizational culture; the conclusions are drawn that a well-thought-out change management system in the public sector can not only improve the quality of people`s lives, but also the quality of public authorities’ activities as a whole.