Will the emerging private-label market access channel help or hinder biosimilar market access?

Until April 2024, adalimumab biosimilar uptake remained stagnant at 2% to 3%; the 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), which control 80% of prescriptions dispensed in the United States, maintained the reference product on formulary. That month, a major PBM changed its adalimumab formulary coverage policy, preferring 2 private-label biosimilars and 1 branded biosimilar, while excluding the reference product. The private-label biosimilar approach has since been adopted by the other 2 major PBMs, offering promise for biosimilar uptake, but seemingly only under the terms of the private-label arrangements. These arrangements may pose additional transparency issues for payers and plan sponsors, as well as barriers to biosimilar competition. The concerns raised by the emergence of the private-label channel apply not only to the adalimumab category but to ustekinumab and future biosimilars covered under the pharmacy benefit. Stakeholders concerned with biosimilar sustainability should monitor this situation as it continues to unfold for its effects on competition, conflicts of interest, and future biosimilar development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.824
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will the emerging private-label market access channel help or hinder biosimilar market access?

Stanton R. Mehr
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Will the emerging private-label market access channel help or hinder biosimilar market access?

Stanton R. Mehr
article en

Abstract

Until April 2024, adalimumab biosimilar uptake remained stagnant at 2% to 3%; the 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), which control 80% of prescriptions dispensed in the United States, maintained the reference product on formulary. That month, a major PBM changed its adalimumab formulary coverage policy, preferring 2 private-label biosimilars and 1 branded biosimilar, while excluding the reference product. The private-label biosimilar approach has since been adopted by the other 2 major PBMs, offering promise for biosimilar uptake, but seemingly only under the terms of the private-label arrangements. These arrangements may pose additional transparency issues for payers and plan sponsors, as well as barriers to biosimilar competition. The concerns raised by the emergence of the private-label channel apply not only to the adalimumab category but to ustekinumab and future biosimilars covered under the pharmacy benefit. Stakeholders concerned with biosimilar sustainability should monitor this situation as it continues to unfold for its effects on competition, conflicts of interest, and future biosimilar development.

Journal of Managed Care & Specialty PharmacyVol. 31(8)
Annual Reviews (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Will the emerging private-label market access channel help or hinder biosimilar market access? — Stanton R. Mehr · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS