Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects

Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects

Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd Uwe Auffarth, Zhiyi Wu, Ramin Khoramnia et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
6.77
article

Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects

Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd Uwe Auffarth, Zhiyi Wu, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Łabuz, Ava Niknahad
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Heidelberg University (DE), Augenklinik Heidelberg (DE), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Klaus Tschira Stiftung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
6.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.