Preparing improvement teams to manage complex change in a continuous improvement program

This study is a cross-case comparison of three cohorts of teams of educators implementing a continuous improvement program in partnership between a university and a district. Using interviews, document analysis, and observation, the researchers looked within and across cohorts to determine how the teams applied the continuous improvement process to their work. Using a complex systems change framework, this study explored the relationship between the program structure and content and the implementation of an improvement process at the schools, including the challenges and benefits of applying the process. By providing the components to manage complex change, this program was able to help schools report benefits of (a) deliberate, deep, and intentional change, (b) within school and across school learning and collaboration, (c) shifting mental models and mindsets, and (d) greater collective responsibility for improvement by mitigating the challenges of (a) the tension between the time available and the complexity of the process, (b) the alignment between the process and district priorities resulting in competing priorities, and (c) the capability to spread the learning school-wide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1566862
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing improvement teams to manage complex change in a continuous improvement program

Erin Anderson
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Educational Assessment and Improvement
4.17
article

Preparing improvement teams to manage complex change in a continuous improvement program

Erin Anderson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study is a cross-case comparison of three cohorts of teams of educators implementing a continuous improvement program in partnership between a university and a district. Using interviews, document analysis, and observation, the researchers looked within and across cohorts to determine how the teams applied the continuous improvement process to their work. Using a complex systems change framework, this study explored the relationship between the program structure and content and the implementation of an improvement process at the schools, including the challenges and benefits of applying the process. By providing the components to manage complex change, this program was able to help schools report benefits of (a) deliberate, deep, and intentional change, (b) within school and across school learning and collaboration, (c) shifting mental models and mindsets, and (d) greater collective responsibility for improvement by mitigating the challenges of (a) the tension between the time available and the complexity of the process, (b) the alignment between the process and district priorities resulting in competing priorities, and (c) the capability to spread the learning school-wide.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.