Mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines: A systematic literature review on resource management

In modern dynamic manufacturing context, product personalisation, and the production-line customisation it may require, are crucial sources of competitiveness, making mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines indispensable. The variability resulting from both internal and external factors, along with resource flexibility, plays a critical role in these settings. Nonetheless, systematic analyses of how resources are considered in such environments remain limited, particularly about variability and the interactions among different resource types. Thus, this work conducts a Systematic Literature Review, analysing 63 studies on Mixed-Model Assembly Lines (MMALPs) and Multi-Model Assembly Lines (MuMALPs). The review investigates resource characteristics – such as space, operator skills, costs, or equipment availability – and whether and how variability in operating times or market demand is addressed. The review shows that cost and availability are the most frequently examined resource characteristics, while space remains comparatively underexplored. Line design and line balancing stand out as the primary objectives, typically tackled via integer programming or metaheuristics, whereas machine learning – though less common overall – is more often employed under high-variability conditions. The results offer practical insights for both researchers and practitioners by highlighting the current gaps uncovered by these findings and suggesting avenues that would be particularly valuable to explore in light of the results obtained, thereby underscoring the need for more in-depth research on flexible and reconfigurable lines, as well as broader implementation in real-world applications in MMALPs and MuMALPs. • Classifies mixed- & multi-model assembly line studies by resource & variability. • Maps objectives and methods in mixed‑ & multi‑model assembly line research. • Proposal of a roadmap for future studies on mixed- & multi-model assembly lines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.07.005
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines: A systematic literature review on resource management

Mario Tucci, Leonardo Leoni, Filippo De Carlo, Italo Cesidio Fantozzi et al.
4 citations
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
4.97
article

Mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines: A systematic literature review on resource management

Mario Tucci, Leonardo Leoni, Filippo De Carlo, Italo Cesidio Fantozzi, Mattia Gianassi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In modern dynamic manufacturing context, product personalisation, and the production-line customisation it may require, are crucial sources of competitiveness, making mixed-model and multi-model assembly lines indispensable. The variability resulting from both internal and external factors, along with resource flexibility, plays a critical role in these settings. Nonetheless, systematic analyses of how resources are considered in such environments remain limited, particularly about variability and the interactions among different resource types. Thus, this work conducts a Systematic Literature Review, analysing 63 studies on Mixed-Model Assembly Lines (MMALPs) and Multi-Model Assembly Lines (MuMALPs). The review investigates resource characteristics – such as space, operator skills, costs, or equipment availability – and whether and how variability in operating times or market demand is addressed. The review shows that cost and availability are the most frequently examined resource characteristics, while space remains comparatively underexplored. Line design and line balancing stand out as the primary objectives, typically tackled via integer programming or metaheuristics, whereas machine learning – though less common overall – is more often employed under high-variability conditions. The results offer practical insights for both researchers and practitioners by highlighting the current gaps uncovered by these findings and suggesting avenues that would be particularly valuable to explore in light of the results obtained, thereby underscoring the need for more in-depth research on flexible and reconfigurable lines, as well as broader implementation in real-world applications in MMALPs and MuMALPs. • Classifies mixed- & multi-model assembly line studies by resource & variability. • Maps objectives and methods in mixed‑ & multi‑model assembly line research. • Proposal of a roadmap for future studies on mixed- & multi-model assembly lines.

Journal of Manufacturing SystemsVol. 82
University of Pisa (IT), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Mercatorum University (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
4.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.