Comparison of Three Sampling Methods for Estimating Grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididea) Assemblages in African Rainforests

Grasshoppers are essential components of terrestrial ecosystems, playing major roles in biodiversity and ecological balance. Assessing grasshopper diversity in specific regions is crucial for understanding species coexistence, supporting sustainable agriculture, and informing conservation efforts. Reliable and standardized survey methods are fundamental to this field. Sweep net sampling is widely recognized as the fastest and most commonly used method globally. This study presents the comparative assessment of three sampling methods for estimating grasshopper assemblages in African rainforests: 30 min of random net sweeping, 1 m 2 open quadrat sampling, and pitfall trapping. These methods were evaluated across two distinct ecological zones, fallow land, and forest. Results show that net sampling is the most effective method for estimating grasshopper diversity in these environments. However, incorporating quadrat sampling and pitfall trapping enhances species diversity assessment. Net sweeping is particularly efficient for collecting winged species in short vegetation, while quadrat sampling and pitfall trapping are better suited for species dwelling in the undergrowth and forest litter. A combine approach incorporating multiple sampling methods provides a more comprehensive assessment of grasshopper diversity, overcoming the limitations of sweeping alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psyche A Journal of Entomology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/psyc/8857340
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Three Sampling Methods for Estimating Grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididea) Assemblages in African Rainforests

Michel Lecoq, Philène Corinne Aude Um Nyobe, Sévilor Kekeunou, Charly Oumarou Ngoute
Psyche A Journal of Entomology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Comparison of Three Sampling Methods for Estimating Grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididea) Assemblages in African Rainforests

Michel Lecoq, Philène Corinne Aude Um Nyobe, Sévilor Kekeunou, Charly Oumarou Ngoute
article en

Abstract

Grasshoppers are essential components of terrestrial ecosystems, playing major roles in biodiversity and ecological balance. Assessing grasshopper diversity in specific regions is crucial for understanding species coexistence, supporting sustainable agriculture, and informing conservation efforts. Reliable and standardized survey methods are fundamental to this field. Sweep net sampling is widely recognized as the fastest and most commonly used method globally. This study presents the comparative assessment of three sampling methods for estimating grasshopper assemblages in African rainforests: 30 min of random net sweeping, 1 m 2 open quadrat sampling, and pitfall trapping. These methods were evaluated across two distinct ecological zones, fallow land, and forest. Results show that net sampling is the most effective method for estimating grasshopper diversity in these environments. However, incorporating quadrat sampling and pitfall trapping enhances species diversity assessment. Net sweeping is particularly efficient for collecting winged species in short vegetation, while quadrat sampling and pitfall trapping are better suited for species dwelling in the undergrowth and forest litter. A combine approach incorporating multiple sampling methods provides a more comprehensive assessment of grasshopper diversity, overcoming the limitations of sweeping alone.

Psyche A Journal of EntomologyVol. 2025(1)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Yaoundé I (CM), University of Douala (CM), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), National Advanced School of Public Works (CM)
Rufford Foundation, Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, Republique du Cameroun
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.