Recognizing the risen Christ by his wounds: Reading John’s account of the above-world body in Greco-Roman context

When the risen Christ appears to his disciples, he offers the marks of his crucifixion as proof of physical resurrection and tokens of recognition but also as confronting symbols of trauma and suffering. Comparisons have been drawn between the appearance of the post-resurrection Christ and the expectations of those shaped by the Greco-Roman tradition to explain both the nature and function of these “marks” as scars. I argue that there are significant dissonances between the representation of scars and death-wounds narrated in Greco-Roman literature and the account of the above-world body of the resurrected Christ in the book of John. These differences impel us to read the “marks” on the body of the resurrected Christ as transfigured wounds rather than scars, with important implications for their narrative function and characterisation of Christ. The startling disjuncture here is that the fullness of life experienced in the world above, as exemplified in the post-resurrection Christ, is not incompatible with woundedness. This points toward a redefinition of what that life might entail, particularly as it relates to trauma, disability, and impairment and also for broader conceptions of authority, honor, and resolution in this world here below.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09518207251355474
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognizing the risen Christ by his wounds: Reading John’s account of the above-world body in Greco-Roman context

Maja I. Whitaker
Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Recognizing the risen Christ by his wounds: Reading John’s account of the above-world body in Greco-Roman context

Maja I. Whitaker
article en

Abstract

When the risen Christ appears to his disciples, he offers the marks of his crucifixion as proof of physical resurrection and tokens of recognition but also as confronting symbols of trauma and suffering. Comparisons have been drawn between the appearance of the post-resurrection Christ and the expectations of those shaped by the Greco-Roman tradition to explain both the nature and function of these “marks” as scars. I argue that there are significant dissonances between the representation of scars and death-wounds narrated in Greco-Roman literature and the account of the above-world body of the resurrected Christ in the book of John. These differences impel us to read the “marks” on the body of the resurrected Christ as transfigured wounds rather than scars, with important implications for their narrative function and characterisation of Christ. The startling disjuncture here is that the fullness of life experienced in the world above, as exemplified in the post-resurrection Christ, is not incompatible with woundedness. This points toward a redefinition of what that life might entail, particularly as it relates to trauma, disability, and impairment and also for broader conceptions of authority, honor, and resolution in this world here below.

Journal for the Study of the PseudepigraphaVol. 35(1)
Laidlaw College (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.