The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Identifying and Extracting Single Case Participant Demographics Data

Performing research syntheses can be challenging due to time, labor, and monetary costs. This manuscript presents the findings of two studies that investigate the usability and feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist with performing research syntheses. In Study 1, participant demographics data coded by humans were compared against data extracted using ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard from 67 single case research design (SCRD) studies in which infants, toddlers, and young children participated. Both AIs achieved interobserver agreement values above 96% for data related to participants’ names, ages, genders, race/ethnicities, and disabilities/conditions. Study 2 compared the time it took two human coders to extract participant demographics data from an additional 40 SCRD studies against ChatGPT-4. ChatGPT-4 extracted data from the studies faster than the human coders. Alhough both AIs may not be ready to autonomously perform research syntheses, findings suggest that both can assist researchers with the coding process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remedial and Special Education
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251352181
Primary Topic
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Identifying and Extracting Single Case Participant Demographics Data

Conrad Oh-Young, Jennifer Buchter, Christine Clark, Chelsea W. Morgan
Remedial and Special Education
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
article

The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Identifying and Extracting Single Case Participant Demographics Data

Conrad Oh-Young, Jennifer Buchter, Christine Clark, Chelsea W. Morgan
article en

Abstract

Performing research syntheses can be challenging due to time, labor, and monetary costs. This manuscript presents the findings of two studies that investigate the usability and feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist with performing research syntheses. In Study 1, participant demographics data coded by humans were compared against data extracted using ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard from 67 single case research design (SCRD) studies in which infants, toddlers, and young children participated. Both AIs achieved interobserver agreement values above 96% for data related to participants’ names, ages, genders, race/ethnicities, and disabilities/conditions. Study 2 compared the time it took two human coders to extract participant demographics data from an additional 40 SCRD studies against ChatGPT-4. ChatGPT-4 extracted data from the studies faster than the human coders. Alhough both AIs may not be ready to autonomously perform research syntheses, findings suggest that both can assist researchers with the coding process.

Remedial and Special Education
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of Kansas (US), Eastern Illinois University (US), California State University, Dominguez Hills (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.