Deciphering Human Error: Improving Cybersecurity Reporting

Human error is a leading cause of cybersecurity breaches, yet inconsistent reporting due to a lack of structured frameworks hinders mitigation. Analysis of five major 2024 cybersecurity reports (Verizon DBIR, IBM, ENISA, Microsoft, Global CISO Survey) reveals how human error is characterized and quantified. Significant inconsistencies, gaps, and ambiguities are identified in classifying “human error” across these sources. Current industry reporting lacks a standardized taxonomy, hampering comparison and effective mitigation strategy development. Drawing on established frameworks (e.g., HFACS, Swiss Cheese Model), integrating a formal human factors classification system into reporting is proposed to improve clarity and actionability. The need for an integrated systemic framework is underscored, calling for industry adoption of standardized human error classification to enable more effective cybersecurity strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251358790
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deciphering Human Error: Improving Cybersecurity Reporting

Jeremiah D. Still, Saroja Roy Grandhi
2 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Information and Cyber Security
6.49
article

Deciphering Human Error: Improving Cybersecurity Reporting

Jeremiah D. Still, Saroja Roy Grandhi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Human error is a leading cause of cybersecurity breaches, yet inconsistent reporting due to a lack of structured frameworks hinders mitigation. Analysis of five major 2024 cybersecurity reports (Verizon DBIR, IBM, ENISA, Microsoft, Global CISO Survey) reveals how human error is characterized and quantified. Significant inconsistencies, gaps, and ambiguities are identified in classifying “human error” across these sources. Current industry reporting lacks a standardized taxonomy, hampering comparison and effective mitigation strategy development. Drawing on established frameworks (e.g., HFACS, Swiss Cheese Model), integrating a formal human factors classification system into reporting is proposed to improve clarity and actionability. The need for an integrated systemic framework is underscored, calling for industry adoption of standardized human error classification to enable more effective cybersecurity strategies.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Information and Cyber Security
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deciphering Human Error: Improving Cybersecurity Reporting — Jeremiah D. Still, Saroja Roy Grandhi · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS