Counting soil microbial communities: the impact of qPCR platform and mastermix on accuracy and precision

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is widely used in soil microbial ecology to quantify microbial communities, but its accuracy can be compromised by coextracted inhibitors. Furthermore, large-scale international studies involving multiple laboratories or meta-analyses studies can introduce variation in qPCR results when data generated from different sources are compared. This study evaluated the performance of four commercial mastermixes across different soil types, a mock community, and a positive template control against three targets on three widely used platforms. Sensitivity to inhibitors was tested, with one mastermix affected, although this was mitigated by adding 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. Amplification success varied by mastermix, platform, gene, and sample matrix. Most mastermix-platform combinations showed low accuracy emphasizing the need for careful pairing. Precision was primarily influenced by gene target, followed by platform, sample matrix, and mastermix, and was reduced at lower template concentrations. Only 64.67% of intraassay (within an assay) measurements meet accepted thresholds. Interassay (between platforms) quantification was unreliable due to significant variability, which increased the risk of inaccurate data interpretation. The study highlights the necessity of considering inter- and intraassay variation, assay accuracy, and inhibitors that may impact sample amplification when utilizing qPCR for quantification of microbial communities in environmental samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaf073
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counting soil microbial communities: the impact of qPCR platform and mastermix on accuracy and precision

Madeline Giles, Syaliny Ganasamurthy, Anselmo Domingos Ferreira Santos, Aoife M. Duff et al.
1 citations
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
0.81
article

Counting soil microbial communities: the impact of qPCR platform and mastermix on accuracy and precision

Madeline Giles, Syaliny Ganasamurthy, Anselmo Domingos Ferreira Santos, Aoife M. Duff, Sergio E. Morales, Fiona Brennan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is widely used in soil microbial ecology to quantify microbial communities, but its accuracy can be compromised by coextracted inhibitors. Furthermore, large-scale international studies involving multiple laboratories or meta-analyses studies can introduce variation in qPCR results when data generated from different sources are compared. This study evaluated the performance of four commercial mastermixes across different soil types, a mock community, and a positive template control against three targets on three widely used platforms. Sensitivity to inhibitors was tested, with one mastermix affected, although this was mitigated by adding 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. Amplification success varied by mastermix, platform, gene, and sample matrix. Most mastermix-platform combinations showed low accuracy emphasizing the need for careful pairing. Precision was primarily influenced by gene target, followed by platform, sample matrix, and mastermix, and was reduced at lower template concentrations. Only 64.67% of intraassay (within an assay) measurements meet accepted thresholds. Interassay (between platforms) quantification was unreliable due to significant variability, which increased the risk of inaccurate data interpretation. The study highlights the necessity of considering inter- and intraassay variation, assay accuracy, and inhibitors that may impact sample amplification when utilizing qPCR for quantification of microbial communities in environmental samples.

FEMS Microbiology EcologyVol. 101(8)
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE), James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Florence (IT), University of Otago (NZ)
University of Otago, Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division, Scottish Government, James Hutton Institute, European Commission, Teagasc
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.