Recommendation of: OntPreHer3D: Ontology for Preservation of Cultural Heritage 3D Models. Round#2

The exponential growth of digital data has fundamentally reshaped the framework within which scientific research is undertaken.The development and institutional adoption of the FAIR principles (Wilkinson et al. 2016) have further stimulated critical reflection on the preservation and reproducibility of archaeological research, an area intrinsically characterised by destructive methodologies.In response, archaeological practices have increasingly been questioned (Huvila & Huggett 2018), with best practices and workflows frequently proposed in academic conferences to facilitate more efficient data sharing and reuse.In this paper, Igor Piotr Bajena addresses the pressing issue of the longevity and reusability of 3D models, resources that are becoming ever more widespread, yet which present numerous challenges.These include the rapid obsolescence of digital formats and the considerable subjectivity involved in model creation, making it difficult to accurately reproduce models or even trace the workflows underpinning their development.Bajena illustrates these issues through a compelling case study, demonstrating how identical datasets and surveys can nonetheless result in significantly different 3D representations.To uphold the scientific integrity of such outputs, the author advocates for the adoption of standardised metadata grounded in a detailed ontology.This methodology embeds not only software and methodological information but also the interpretative reasoning and subjective decisions made by researchers, thereby recognising their active role in the modelling process.Following a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape, he proposes an extension of the CIDOC CRM ontology capable of documenting the entire lifecycle of 3D object creation.This initiative addresses a substantial gap in the production and documentation of digital heritage data.Moreover, by building upon Web 3.0 and Linked Open Data principles, the proposed standardisation ensures that metadata is both human-and machine-readable.This, in turn, enables greater automation, reproducibility, and reusability of models, and aligns closely with the core objectives of the FAIR principles.

Publication Details

Journal
Peer Community In Archaeology
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.archaeo.100592
Citations
2
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommendation of: OntPreHer3D: Ontology for Preservation of Cultural Heritage 3D Models. Round#2

2 citations
Peer Community In Archaeology
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
4.69
article

Recommendation of: OntPreHer3D: Ontology for Preservation of Cultural Heritage 3D Models. Round#2

article en
2 citations

Abstract

The exponential growth of digital data has fundamentally reshaped the framework within which scientific research is undertaken.The development and institutional adoption of the FAIR principles (Wilkinson et al. 2016) have further stimulated critical reflection on the preservation and reproducibility of archaeological research, an area intrinsically characterised by destructive methodologies.In response, archaeological practices have increasingly been questioned (Huvila & Huggett 2018), with best practices and workflows frequently proposed in academic conferences to facilitate more efficient data sharing and reuse.In this paper, Igor Piotr Bajena addresses the pressing issue of the longevity and reusability of 3D models, resources that are becoming ever more widespread, yet which present numerous challenges.These include the rapid obsolescence of digital formats and the considerable subjectivity involved in model creation, making it difficult to accurately reproduce models or even trace the workflows underpinning their development.Bajena illustrates these issues through a compelling case study, demonstrating how identical datasets and surveys can nonetheless result in significantly different 3D representations.To uphold the scientific integrity of such outputs, the author advocates for the adoption of standardised metadata grounded in a detailed ontology.This methodology embeds not only software and methodological information but also the interpretative reasoning and subjective decisions made by researchers, thereby recognising their active role in the modelling process.Following a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape, he proposes an extension of the CIDOC CRM ontology capable of documenting the entire lifecycle of 3D object creation.This initiative addresses a substantial gap in the production and documentation of digital heritage data.Moreover, by building upon Web 3.0 and Linked Open Data principles, the proposed standardisation ensures that metadata is both human-and machine-readable.This, in turn, enables greater automation, reproducibility, and reusability of models, and aligns closely with the core objectives of the FAIR principles.

Peer Community In Archaeology
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
4.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.