Quality Education at the Undergraduate Level: Perspectives of Undergraduates

The study investigated quality education at the undergraduate level from the perspectives of undergraduate students. The study examined whether the teachers make the goals and standards clear to the learners at the beginning of the courses, use proper assessment and teaching methods, the programs make the students independent learners, improve their generic skills, and make the learners independent. Using a quantitative research design, data were collected from the undergraduate students at two public sector universities through a 36-item Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) validated by Wilson et al. (1997) with 6 dimensions, results showed that majority of the students agreed that teachers made the goals and standards clear, the program developed generic skills, teachers used proper teaching and assessment methods, and the workload was appropriate. However, a significant number of participants either disagreed or were uncertain about the dimensions. It indicates that there is further scope for improvement in all the dimensions. The study recommends that teachers further focus on sharing the course objectives and standards expected from graduates in their course. There is a need for better communication between teachers and students. Universities may review the courses to determine whether they offer an appropriate workload at the undergraduate level. The universities may arrange regular professional development programs with a focus on methods of teaching and assessment. Teachers may include presentations, case studies, problems, and critical analysis to improve the generic skills of learners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research (SJESR)
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol7-iss4-2024(8-15)
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality Education at the Undergraduate Level: Perspectives of Undergraduates

Itbar Khan, Nazia Saeed
Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research (SJESR)
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Quality Education at the Undergraduate Level: Perspectives of Undergraduates

Itbar Khan, Nazia Saeed
article en

Abstract

The study investigated quality education at the undergraduate level from the perspectives of undergraduate students. The study examined whether the teachers make the goals and standards clear to the learners at the beginning of the courses, use proper assessment and teaching methods, the programs make the students independent learners, improve their generic skills, and make the learners independent. Using a quantitative research design, data were collected from the undergraduate students at two public sector universities through a 36-item Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) validated by Wilson et al. (1997) with 6 dimensions, results showed that majority of the students agreed that teachers made the goals and standards clear, the program developed generic skills, teachers used proper teaching and assessment methods, and the workload was appropriate. However, a significant number of participants either disagreed or were uncertain about the dimensions. It indicates that there is further scope for improvement in all the dimensions. The study recommends that teachers further focus on sharing the course objectives and standards expected from graduates in their course. There is a need for better communication between teachers and students. Universities may review the courses to determine whether they offer an appropriate workload at the undergraduate level. The universities may arrange regular professional development programs with a focus on methods of teaching and assessment. Teachers may include presentations, case studies, problems, and critical analysis to improve the generic skills of learners.

Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research (SJESR)Vol. 7(4)
University of Malakand (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.