Assessing quantitative MRI techniques using multimodal comparisons

The study of brain structure and change in neuroscience is commonly conducted using macroscopic morphological measures of the brain such as regional volume or cortical thickness, providing little insight into the microstructure and physiology of the brain. In contrast, quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) allows the monitoring of microscopic brain change non-invasively in-vivo, and provides directly comparable values between tissues, regions, and individuals. To support the development and common use of qMRI for cognitive neuroscience, we analysed a set of qMRI and dMRI metrics (R1, R2*, Magnetization Transfer saturation, Proton Density saturation, Fractional Anisotropy, Mean Diffusivity) in 101 healthy young adults. Here we provide a comprehensive descriptive analysis of these metrics and their linear relationships to each other in grey and white matter to develop a more complete understanding of the relationship to tissue microstructure. Furthermore, we provide evidence that combinations of metrics may uncover informative gradients across the brain by showing that lower variance components of PCA may be used to identify cortical gradients otherwise hidden within individual metrics. We discuss these results within the context of microstructural and physiological neuroscience research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327828
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing quantitative MRI techniques using multimodal comparisons

Francis Carter, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Alfred Anwander, Antoine Lutti et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
2.72
article

Assessing quantitative MRI techniques using multimodal comparisons

Francis Carter, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Alfred Anwander, Antoine Lutti, Pierre‐Louis Bazin, Christopher J. Steele, Angela D. Friederici, Claudine Joëlle Gauthier, Helyne Adamson, Marc A. Johnson, Thomás Goucha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The study of brain structure and change in neuroscience is commonly conducted using macroscopic morphological measures of the brain such as regional volume or cortical thickness, providing little insight into the microstructure and physiology of the brain. In contrast, quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) allows the monitoring of microscopic brain change non-invasively in-vivo, and provides directly comparable values between tissues, regions, and individuals. To support the development and common use of qMRI for cognitive neuroscience, we analysed a set of qMRI and dMRI metrics (R1, R2*, Magnetization Transfer saturation, Proton Density saturation, Fractional Anisotropy, Mean Diffusivity) in 101 healthy young adults. Here we provide a comprehensive descriptive analysis of these metrics and their linear relationships to each other in grey and white matter to develop a more complete understanding of the relationship to tissue microstructure. Furthermore, we provide evidence that combinations of metrics may uncover informative gradients across the brain by showing that lower variance components of PCA may be used to identify cortical gradients otherwise hidden within individual metrics. We discuss these results within the context of microstructural and physiological neuroscience research.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(7)
Montreal Heart Institute (CA), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), Concordia University (CA), University of Amsterdam (NL), Leipzig University (DE), University of Lausanne (CH)
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Heart And Stroke Foundation Of Quebec, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.