Integrating vertiports into Australian airports - A comparative literature review of regulatory frameworks from CASA, FAA, and EASA

This paper systematically evaluates the regulatory frameworks for integrating vertiport infrastructure to support Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) within Australia's airport ecosystem. Unlike the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which have issued detailed vertiport regulations, including emergency procedures and infrastructure compatibility for battery-powered AAM, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) approach remains high-level. It is still largely derived from helicopter regulations. By conducting a comparative analysis of CASA, the FAA, and the EASA, the study identifies specific regulatory gaps in CASA's framework, particularly concerning vertiport design, operational safety, and infrastructure for emerging propulsion technologies like hydrogen power. To address these gaps, the paper recommends that CASA (i) adopt scalable vertiport layout and design standards, (ii) introduce performance-based criteria for infrastructure compatibility with battery-electric and hydrogen propulsion systems, and (iii) establish clearer integration protocols for AAM within existing commercial airport environments. The findings further highlight that, while CASA has expressed a commitment to regulatory innovation, the pace of implementation remains slow in comparison to the urgency of AAM deployment. Accelerating the adoption of international best practices from the FAA and EASA would allow CASA to address the challenges of vertiport integration and position itself as a global leader in aviation regulatory reform. • Integrating Vertiports into Australian Airports: A Comparative Literature Review of Regulatory Frameworks from CASA, FAA, and EASA • CASA’s vertiport regulations lack clear AAM-specific infrastructure guidelines. • FAA and EASA offer structured vertiport design and safety standards, unlike CASA. • Integrating vertiports into airports requires multimodal connectivity planning. • Hydrogen and battery-powered AAMs need new infrastructure and policy adaptation. • Regulatory harmonisation can improve Australia’s AAM adoption and operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transport Policy
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.035
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating vertiports into Australian airports - A comparative literature review of regulatory frameworks from CASA, FAA, and EASA

Zheng Lei, Jennifer A. Hayward, Tommy Cheung, Salim Hijazeen
5 citations
Transport Policy
Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
15.43
article

Integrating vertiports into Australian airports - A comparative literature review of regulatory frameworks from CASA, FAA, and EASA

Zheng Lei, Jennifer A. Hayward, Tommy Cheung, Salim Hijazeen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper systematically evaluates the regulatory frameworks for integrating vertiport infrastructure to support Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) within Australia's airport ecosystem. Unlike the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which have issued detailed vertiport regulations, including emergency procedures and infrastructure compatibility for battery-powered AAM, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) approach remains high-level. It is still largely derived from helicopter regulations. By conducting a comparative analysis of CASA, the FAA, and the EASA, the study identifies specific regulatory gaps in CASA's framework, particularly concerning vertiport design, operational safety, and infrastructure for emerging propulsion technologies like hydrogen power. To address these gaps, the paper recommends that CASA (i) adopt scalable vertiport layout and design standards, (ii) introduce performance-based criteria for infrastructure compatibility with battery-electric and hydrogen propulsion systems, and (iii) establish clearer integration protocols for AAM within existing commercial airport environments. The findings further highlight that, while CASA has expressed a commitment to regulatory innovation, the pace of implementation remains slow in comparison to the urgency of AAM deployment. Accelerating the adoption of international best practices from the FAA and EASA would allow CASA to address the challenges of vertiport integration and position itself as a global leader in aviation regulatory reform. • Integrating Vertiports into Australian Airports: A Comparative Literature Review of Regulatory Frameworks from CASA, FAA, and EASA • CASA’s vertiport regulations lack clear AAM-specific infrastructure guidelines. • FAA and EASA offer structured vertiport design and safety standards, unlike CASA. • Integrating vertiports into airports requires multimodal connectivity planning. • Hydrogen and battery-powered AAMs need new infrastructure and policy adaptation. • Regulatory harmonisation can improve Australia’s AAM adoption and operations.

Transport PolicyVol. 172
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
15.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.