Limitations of principal component analysis in COVID-19 CT image classification

This study critically evaluates the methodological approach employed by Nayak et al. in COVID-19 CT scan classification using their Dense-Res-Inception Ensemble Network with PCA dimensionality reduction. We demonstrate fundamental limitations in applying PCA to nonlinear biological imaging data, where key mathematical assumptions—including linearity, meaningful correlations, and homoscedasticity—are frequently violated. Using the MNIST dataset as a benchmark, we comparatively assessed three dimensionality reduction techniques: PCA, High Variance Gene Selection, and Feature Agglomeration (FA). Results confirm that FA significantly outperforms PCA (92.79% vs 83.76% accuracy) by preserving crucial spatial relationships within image data. This performance disparity highlights the critical importance of methodological alignment with data characteristics in medical imaging analysis. We propose that nonlinear dimensionality reduction approaches better accommodate the complex relationships inherent in biological systems, potentially enhancing both computational efficiency and diagnostic reliability in clinical applications requiring rapid assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108353
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations of principal component analysis in COVID-19 CT image classification

Yoshiyasu Takefuji
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

Limitations of principal component analysis in COVID-19 CT image classification

Yoshiyasu Takefuji
article en

Abstract

This study critically evaluates the methodological approach employed by Nayak et al. in COVID-19 CT scan classification using their Dense-Res-Inception Ensemble Network with PCA dimensionality reduction. We demonstrate fundamental limitations in applying PCA to nonlinear biological imaging data, where key mathematical assumptions—including linearity, meaningful correlations, and homoscedasticity—are frequently violated. Using the MNIST dataset as a benchmark, we comparatively assessed three dimensionality reduction techniques: PCA, High Variance Gene Selection, and Feature Agglomeration (FA). Results confirm that FA significantly outperforms PCA (92.79% vs 83.76% accuracy) by preserving crucial spatial relationships within image data. This performance disparity highlights the critical importance of methodological alignment with data characteristics in medical imaging analysis. We propose that nonlinear dimensionality reduction approaches better accommodate the complex relationships inherent in biological systems, potentially enhancing both computational efficiency and diagnostic reliability in clinical applications requiring rapid assessment.

Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlVol. 111
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.