Decision factors for the selection of AI-based decision support systems—The case of task delegation in prognostics

Decision support systems (DSS) integrating artificial intelligence (AI) hold the potential to significantly enhance organizational decision-making performance and speed in areas such as prognostics in machine maintenance. A key issue for organizations aiming to leverage this potential is to select an appropriate AI-based DSS. In this paper, we develop a delegation perspective to identify decision factors and underlying AI system characteristics that affect the selection of AI-based DSS. Utilizing the analytical hierarchy process method, we derive decision weights for these characteristics and apply them to three archetypes of AI-based DSS designed for prognostics. Additionally, we explore how users' expertise levels impact their preferences for specific AI system characteristics. The results confirm that Performance is the most important decision factor, followed by Effort and Transparency. In line with these results, we find that the archetypes of prognostics systems using Direct Remaining Useful Life estimation and Similarity-based Matching best fit user preferences. Moreover, we find that novices and experts strongly prefer visual over structural explanations, while users with moderate expertise also value structural explanations to develop their skills further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328411
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision factors for the selection of AI-based decision support systems—The case of task delegation in prognostics

Oliver Krancher, Patrick Zschech, Christian Janiesch, Jonas Wanner et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
4.21
article

Decision factors for the selection of AI-based decision support systems—The case of task delegation in prognostics

Oliver Krancher, Patrick Zschech, Christian Janiesch, Jonas Wanner, Kai Heinrich, Philip Stahmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Decision support systems (DSS) integrating artificial intelligence (AI) hold the potential to significantly enhance organizational decision-making performance and speed in areas such as prognostics in machine maintenance. A key issue for organizations aiming to leverage this potential is to select an appropriate AI-based DSS. In this paper, we develop a delegation perspective to identify decision factors and underlying AI system characteristics that affect the selection of AI-based DSS. Utilizing the analytical hierarchy process method, we derive decision weights for these characteristics and apply them to three archetypes of AI-based DSS designed for prognostics. Additionally, we explore how users' expertise levels impact their preferences for specific AI system characteristics. The results confirm that Performance is the most important decision factor, followed by Effort and Transparency. In line with these results, we find that the archetypes of prognostics systems using Direct Remaining Useful Life estimation and Similarity-based Matching best fit user preferences. Moreover, we find that novices and experts strongly prefer visual over structural explanations, while users with moderate expertise also value structural explanations to develop their skills further.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(7)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), IT University of Copenhagen (DK), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.