Nucleosome placement and polymer mechanics explain genomic contacts on 100 kb scales

The 3D organization of the genome-in particular, which two regions of DNA are in contact with each other-plays a role in regulating gene expression. Several factors influence genome 3D organization. Nucleosomes (where ∼100 base pairs of DNA wrap around histone proteins) bend, twist, and compactify chromosomal DNA, altering its polymer mechanics. How much does the positioning of nucleosomes between gene loci influence contacts between those gene loci? And to what extent are polymer mechanics responsible for this? To address this question, we combine a stochastic polymer mechanics model of chromosomal DNA including twists and wrapping induced by nucleosomes with two data-driven pipelines. The first estimates nucleosome positioning from ATAC-seq data in regions of high accessibility. Most of the genome is low accessibility, so we combine this with a novel image analysis method that estimates the distribution of nucleosome spacing from electron microscopy data. There are no fit parameters in the biophysical model. We apply this method to IL-6, IL-15, CXCL9, and CXCL10, inflammatory marker genes in macrophages, before and after inflammatory stimulation, and compare the predictions with contacts measured by conformation capture experiments (4C-seq). We find that within a 500-kb genomic region, polymer mechanics with nucleosomes can explain 71% of close contacts. These results suggest that, while genome contacts on 100 kb scales are multifactorial, they may be amenable to mechanistic, physical explanation. Our work also highlights the role of nucleosomes, not just at the loci of interest, but between them, and not just the total number of nucleosomes, but their specific placement. The method generalizes to other genes, and can be used to address whether a contact is under active regulation by the cell (e.g. a macrophage during inflammatory stimulation).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaf670
Primary Topic
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nucleosome placement and polymer mechanics explain genomic contacts on 100 kb scales

Timothy L. Downing, Andrew J. Spakowitz, Jun Allard, Jiachun Li et al.
Nucleic Acids Research
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
article

Nucleosome placement and polymer mechanics explain genomic contacts on 100 kb scales

Timothy L. Downing, Andrew J. Spakowitz, Jun Allard, Jiachun Li, Praveen Krishna Veerasubramanian, John Corrette, Hanjuan Shao
article en

Abstract

The 3D organization of the genome-in particular, which two regions of DNA are in contact with each other-plays a role in regulating gene expression. Several factors influence genome 3D organization. Nucleosomes (where ∼100 base pairs of DNA wrap around histone proteins) bend, twist, and compactify chromosomal DNA, altering its polymer mechanics. How much does the positioning of nucleosomes between gene loci influence contacts between those gene loci? And to what extent are polymer mechanics responsible for this? To address this question, we combine a stochastic polymer mechanics model of chromosomal DNA including twists and wrapping induced by nucleosomes with two data-driven pipelines. The first estimates nucleosome positioning from ATAC-seq data in regions of high accessibility. Most of the genome is low accessibility, so we combine this with a novel image analysis method that estimates the distribution of nucleosome spacing from electron microscopy data. There are no fit parameters in the biophysical model. We apply this method to IL-6, IL-15, CXCL9, and CXCL10, inflammatory marker genes in macrophages, before and after inflammatory stimulation, and compare the predictions with contacts measured by conformation capture experiments (4C-seq). We find that within a 500-kb genomic region, polymer mechanics with nucleosomes can explain 71% of close contacts. These results suggest that, while genome contacts on 100 kb scales are multifactorial, they may be amenable to mechanistic, physical explanation. Our work also highlights the role of nucleosomes, not just at the loci of interest, but between them, and not just the total number of nucleosomes, but their specific placement. The method generalizes to other genes, and can be used to address whether a contact is under active regulation by the cell (e.g. a macrophage during inflammatory stimulation).

Nucleic Acids ResearchVol. 53(14)
University of California, Irvine (US), Irvine University (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, Simons Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Division of Mathematical Sciences, Division of Emerging Frontiers
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.