Pertanggungjawaban Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemberian Keterangan Palsu secara Menyesatkan kepada Penerima Fidusia ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 (Studi Putusan Nomor 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk)

This study is motivated by the legal accountability issues surrounding perpetrators of criminal acts involving the provision of misleading false statements to fiduciary recipients, which constitutes a violation of the principle of trust in fiduciary security agreements. Providing false information not only causes legal and economic harm to the fiduciary recipient but also undermines the validity of the collateral object itself. The objective of this research is to analyze the forms of legal accountability imposed on such offenders based on Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security, through a case study of Decision Number 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk in the Bandar Lampung jurisdiction. The research employs a normative juridical method, using statutory, legal theory, and judicial decision approaches. The findings indicate that perpetrators may be subject to criminal sanctions under Article 35 of Law Number 42 of 1999 and, in specific cases, may also be charged under provisions in the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) relating to fraud or data falsification. Legal enforcement against such offenders is essential to create a deterrent effect and to ensure legal protection for fiduciary recipients. This study recommends stricter oversight of fiduciary agreement implementation and improved public legal literacy regarding the legal consequences of providing false information in fiduciary practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AHKAM
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i3.6820
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemberian Keterangan Palsu secara Menyesatkan kepada Penerima Fidusia ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 (Studi Putusan Nomor 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk)

Zainab Ompu Jainah, Leicha Yarra
AHKAM
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemberian Keterangan Palsu secara Menyesatkan kepada Penerima Fidusia ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 (Studi Putusan Nomor 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk)

Zainab Ompu Jainah, Leicha Yarra
article en

Abstract

This study is motivated by the legal accountability issues surrounding perpetrators of criminal acts involving the provision of misleading false statements to fiduciary recipients, which constitutes a violation of the principle of trust in fiduciary security agreements. Providing false information not only causes legal and economic harm to the fiduciary recipient but also undermines the validity of the collateral object itself. The objective of this research is to analyze the forms of legal accountability imposed on such offenders based on Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security, through a case study of Decision Number 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk in the Bandar Lampung jurisdiction. The research employs a normative juridical method, using statutory, legal theory, and judicial decision approaches. The findings indicate that perpetrators may be subject to criminal sanctions under Article 35 of Law Number 42 of 1999 and, in specific cases, may also be charged under provisions in the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) relating to fraud or data falsification. Legal enforcement against such offenders is essential to create a deterrent effect and to ensure legal protection for fiduciary recipients. This study recommends stricter oversight of fiduciary agreement implementation and improved public legal literacy regarding the legal consequences of providing false information in fiduciary practices.

AHKAMVol. 4(3)
Universitas Bandar Lampung (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemberian Keterangan Palsu secara Menyesatkan kepada Penerima Fidusia ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 (Studi Putusan Nomor 75/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tjk) — Zainab Ompu Jainah, Leicha Yarra · AHKAM (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS