Unraveling Misinformation: Insights from Large-scale Data Analysis

The proliferation of fake news on social media prevents users from obtaining accurate information, affects people's judgment, endangers public health, and undermines social stability, often with serious consequences. We collected 226,681 instances of misinformation from major media outlets such as Yahoo, Fox News, and Forbes, spanning from August 21, 2018, to August 21, 2023. Our analysis aims to uncover common patterns, popular themes, and potential factors that lead to the widespread of misinformation. We utilized a large language model (LLM) to address potential biases in the data and assess four key bias dimensions: gender, political, racial, and religious. This in-depth analysis revealed complex bias patterns across various media platforms. In our comparative evaluation of machine learning models–including logistic regression, random forest, RNN, CNN, and SBERT-we observed promising results in misinformation classification. News headlines contain highly informative signals, yielding strong predictive performance. While incorporating full-text analysis offered marginal improvements in accuracy, the headline alone emerged as a crucial predictor, underscoring the dense informational value of concise text. The complete dataset is available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11314826.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetci64844.2025.11084168
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling Misinformation: Insights from Large-scale Data Analysis

Guozhe Jin, Jianing Xia, Hui Yin, Xiaodan Wang
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Unraveling Misinformation: Insights from Large-scale Data Analysis

Guozhe Jin, Jianing Xia, Hui Yin, Xiaodan Wang
article en

Abstract

The proliferation of fake news on social media prevents users from obtaining accurate information, affects people's judgment, endangers public health, and undermines social stability, often with serious consequences. We collected 226,681 instances of misinformation from major media outlets such as Yahoo, Fox News, and Forbes, spanning from August 21, 2018, to August 21, 2023. Our analysis aims to uncover common patterns, popular themes, and potential factors that lead to the widespread of misinformation. We utilized a large language model (LLM) to address potential biases in the data and assess four key bias dimensions: gender, political, racial, and religious. This in-depth analysis revealed complex bias patterns across various media platforms. In our comparative evaluation of machine learning models–including logistic regression, random forest, RNN, CNN, and SBERT-we observed promising results in misinformation classification. News headlines contain highly informative signals, yielding strong predictive performance. While incorporating full-text analysis offered marginal improvements in accuracy, the headline alone emerged as a crucial predictor, underscoring the dense informational value of concise text. The complete dataset is available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11314826.

Deakin University (AU), Yanbian University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.