Study on the application of improved VMAT based on collaborative partitioning of beam and target in hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy

To develop an improved linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (I-VMAT) for Hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) and compare it with conventional VMAT (C-VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT). This retrospective study created HA-WBRT plans (30 Gy/10 fractions) for each of the 24 patients using three different groups: C-VMAT (three full arcs: alternating clockwise with a 15° collimator angle and counter-clockwise with a 345° collimator angle), I-VMAT, and HT. I-VMAT featured PTV and field partitioning based on hippocampus anatomy and a fixed 90° collimator angle. Dosimetric parameters for PTV and organs at risk (OARs), monitor units (MU), and delivery time were compared. Regarding PTV dosimetric parameters (D2 %, D95 %, D98 %, Dmax, Homogeneity Index[HI]), both I-VMAT and HT significantly outperformed C-VMAT (P < 0.05). When including Conformity Index (CI), I-VMAT and HT showed comparable outcomes (P > 0.05). No significant inter-group differences were observed for hippocampus Dmin (P > 0.05). For hippocampus Dmax, I-VMAT (9.89 ± 0.33 Gy) and HT (10.32 ± 0.89 Gy) were superior to C-VMAT (15.50 ± 1.16 Gy) (P < 0.05), with I-VMAT significantly outperforming HT (P < 0.05). Similarly, for hippocampus Dmean, I-VMAT (8.33 ± 0.21 Gy) and HT (8.61 ± 0.37 Gy) yielded significantly lower values than C-VMAT (9.89 ± 0.43 Gy) (P < 0.05), with I-VMAT again superior to HT (P < 0.05). I-VMAT required significantly fewer monitor units (MUs) than C-VMAT (1170.25 ± 62.72 vs. 1346.25 ± 43.76, P < 0.05). Delivery times for I-VMAT (204.80 ± 11.23 s) and C-VMAT (235.76 ± 6.91 s) were significantly shorter than for HT (798.48 ± 22.48 s) (P < 0.05). The I-VMAT technique significantly improved target coverage, dose homogeneity, and hippocampus sparing for HA-WBRT compared to C-VMAT, with metrics outperforming RTOG 0933 criteria. I-VMAT achieved comparable plan quality to HT while offering superior delivery efficiency and lower hippocampus doses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101816
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the application of improved VMAT based on collaborative partitioning of beam and target in hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy

Weiwei Yao, Qianxi Ni, Kang Zhang, Songhua Yang et al.
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Study on the application of improved VMAT based on collaborative partitioning of beam and target in hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy

Weiwei Yao, Qianxi Ni, Kang Zhang, Songhua Yang, Xiaohua Sun, Siyang Huang, Jie Pang, Wei Luo
article en

Abstract

To develop an improved linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (I-VMAT) for Hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) and compare it with conventional VMAT (C-VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT). This retrospective study created HA-WBRT plans (30 Gy/10 fractions) for each of the 24 patients using three different groups: C-VMAT (three full arcs: alternating clockwise with a 15° collimator angle and counter-clockwise with a 345° collimator angle), I-VMAT, and HT. I-VMAT featured PTV and field partitioning based on hippocampus anatomy and a fixed 90° collimator angle. Dosimetric parameters for PTV and organs at risk (OARs), monitor units (MU), and delivery time were compared. Regarding PTV dosimetric parameters (D2 %, D95 %, D98 %, Dmax, Homogeneity Index[HI]), both I-VMAT and HT significantly outperformed C-VMAT (P < 0.05). When including Conformity Index (CI), I-VMAT and HT showed comparable outcomes (P > 0.05). No significant inter-group differences were observed for hippocampus Dmin (P > 0.05). For hippocampus Dmax, I-VMAT (9.89 ± 0.33 Gy) and HT (10.32 ± 0.89 Gy) were superior to C-VMAT (15.50 ± 1.16 Gy) (P < 0.05), with I-VMAT significantly outperforming HT (P < 0.05). Similarly, for hippocampus Dmean, I-VMAT (8.33 ± 0.21 Gy) and HT (8.61 ± 0.37 Gy) yielded significantly lower values than C-VMAT (9.89 ± 0.43 Gy) (P < 0.05), with I-VMAT again superior to HT (P < 0.05). I-VMAT required significantly fewer monitor units (MUs) than C-VMAT (1170.25 ± 62.72 vs. 1346.25 ± 43.76, P < 0.05). Delivery times for I-VMAT (204.80 ± 11.23 s) and C-VMAT (235.76 ± 6.91 s) were significantly shorter than for HT (798.48 ± 22.48 s) (P < 0.05). The I-VMAT technique significantly improved target coverage, dose homogeneity, and hippocampus sparing for HA-WBRT compared to C-VMAT, with metrics outperforming RTOG 0933 criteria. I-VMAT achieved comparable plan quality to HT while offering superior delivery efficiency and lower hippocampus doses.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 18(3)
Central South University (CN), Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN), United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN), University of South China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.