Women's rights to land in Tanzania: Does village land use planning strengthen women's land rights?

Based on a scoping review of the literature, we examine whether village land use planning (VLUP) in Tanzania strengthens women's land rights, as measured by women owning Customary Certificates of Right of Occupancy (CCROs) as individuals, or jointly. The review highlights significant variations in the outcomes of VLUP processes for women. While some projects show high levels of CCROs ownership by women, in many cases there are obstacles to them claiming their rights and receiving the document. Key challenges include limited participation of women in VLUP processes, limited female representation in village institutions, the costs of CCRO applications, patriarchal norms, and household power dynamics. Some civil society organizations have improved women's participation in VLUPs, and developing village bylaws has proven effective in reducing gender disparities in land ownership and improving women's representation. Despite these initiatives, challenges remain, such as women's reluctance to increase their already significant labour burden with unpaid voluntary positions, and social norms limiting their participation in meetings. External organizations have also introduced cellphone-based applications or remote sensing data to facilitate the collection of data and resolution of disputes. However, these technological solutions require supportive training and a favorable socio-cultural environment to be effective. We conclude that while VLUP processes have potential for securing women's land rights, in many cases men may benefit at the expense of women, unless significant investment is made in ensuring gender equity. The marginalization of pastoralist communities and ethnic minorities in VLUP may also need attention in some cases. The government of Tanzania is encouraged to collect data on women's land rights to report on progress towards SDG goal 5a and ensure women's economic empowerment through land rights. • Village Land Use Planning (VLUP) is done in Tanzania prior to rural land being registered. • Problems that limited the capacity of VLUP to strengthen women's land rights include: • Limited participation of women, limited representation of women in local institutions. • Insufficient awareness of the land laws and strong influence of patriarchal norms. • Tracking women's land rights in Tanzania through SDG goal 5.a is imperative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103805
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women's rights to land in Tanzania: Does village land use planning strengthen women's land rights?

Chris Huggins, Lina Awadalla, Neema Kingamkono
Journal of Rural Studies
Land Rights and Reforms
article

Women's rights to land in Tanzania: Does village land use planning strengthen women's land rights?

Chris Huggins, Lina Awadalla, Neema Kingamkono
article en

Abstract

Based on a scoping review of the literature, we examine whether village land use planning (VLUP) in Tanzania strengthens women's land rights, as measured by women owning Customary Certificates of Right of Occupancy (CCROs) as individuals, or jointly. The review highlights significant variations in the outcomes of VLUP processes for women. While some projects show high levels of CCROs ownership by women, in many cases there are obstacles to them claiming their rights and receiving the document. Key challenges include limited participation of women in VLUP processes, limited female representation in village institutions, the costs of CCRO applications, patriarchal norms, and household power dynamics. Some civil society organizations have improved women's participation in VLUPs, and developing village bylaws has proven effective in reducing gender disparities in land ownership and improving women's representation. Despite these initiatives, challenges remain, such as women's reluctance to increase their already significant labour burden with unpaid voluntary positions, and social norms limiting their participation in meetings. External organizations have also introduced cellphone-based applications or remote sensing data to facilitate the collection of data and resolution of disputes. However, these technological solutions require supportive training and a favorable socio-cultural environment to be effective. We conclude that while VLUP processes have potential for securing women's land rights, in many cases men may benefit at the expense of women, unless significant investment is made in ensuring gender equity. The marginalization of pastoralist communities and ethnic minorities in VLUP may also need attention in some cases. The government of Tanzania is encouraged to collect data on women's land rights to report on progress towards SDG goal 5a and ensure women's economic empowerment through land rights. • Village Land Use Planning (VLUP) is done in Tanzania prior to rural land being registered. • Problems that limited the capacity of VLUP to strengthen women's land rights include: • Limited participation of women, limited representation of women in local institutions. • Insufficient awareness of the land laws and strong influence of patriarchal norms. • Tracking women's land rights in Tanzania through SDG goal 5.a is imperative.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 119
University of Ottawa (CA)
University of Ottawa, Korea International Cooperation Agency
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.