Policy Trenches: American Federalism and the Politics of Cross-Sectoral Action on Housing and Education Inequality

Abstract The structure of federalism in the United States links housing and education policy issues in significant ways. However, institutional frictions can make it challenging for policymakers to engage in “cross-sector” policy efforts that impact multiple policy areas at once. Further, decentralization means that it is difficult to measure policymaking attention across the US system, particularly at the local level. In this article, we use a mix of methods to measure cross-sector policy attention to education and housing policy at the federal, state, and local levels between 2014 and 2024. We find that cross-sector attention has been limited and inconsistent at all levels, and appears mostly in Democratic administrations and areas. Overall, we conclude that federal instability and local capacity challenges mean state action, such as ongoing work in New Jersey and Minnesota, may be the most promising avenues for cross-sector action to address spatial inequalities in the immediate future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Publius The Journal of Federalism
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Trenches: American Federalism and the Politics of Cross-Sectoral Action on Housing and Education Inequality

Tyler Simko, Genevieve Siegel‐Hawley
2 citations
Publius The Journal of Federalism
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
8.40
article

Policy Trenches: American Federalism and the Politics of Cross-Sectoral Action on Housing and Education Inequality

Tyler Simko, Genevieve Siegel‐Hawley
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The structure of federalism in the United States links housing and education policy issues in significant ways. However, institutional frictions can make it challenging for policymakers to engage in “cross-sector” policy efforts that impact multiple policy areas at once. Further, decentralization means that it is difficult to measure policymaking attention across the US system, particularly at the local level. In this article, we use a mix of methods to measure cross-sector policy attention to education and housing policy at the federal, state, and local levels between 2014 and 2024. We find that cross-sector attention has been limited and inconsistent at all levels, and appears mostly in Democratic administrations and areas. Overall, we conclude that federal instability and local capacity challenges mean state action, such as ongoing work in New Jersey and Minnesota, may be the most promising avenues for cross-sector action to address spatial inequalities in the immediate future.

Publius The Journal of FederalismVol. 55(3)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Policy Trenches: American Federalism and the Politics of Cross-Sectoral Action on Housing and Education Inequality — Tyler Simko, Genevieve Siegel‐Hawley · Publius The Journal of Federalism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS