Comparison of neutron activation analysis and passive counting for environmental radioactivity measurements

Neutron activation analysis is not usually known used for environmental radioactivity measurements as compared to low-level passive gamma-ray counting. Texas local background samples were taken as part of a study to compare neutron activation versus passive counting. The benefits and drawbacks of each method are explored for soil samples which are in secular equilibrium, including gamma-ray self-attenuation, sample size and counting times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107766
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of neutron activation analysis and passive counting for environmental radioactivity measurements

JohnPeter Bekker, Derek A. Haas, S. Landsberger, Nicholas Kaitschuck
2 citations
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
3.08
article

Comparison of neutron activation analysis and passive counting for environmental radioactivity measurements

JohnPeter Bekker, Derek A. Haas, S. Landsberger, Nicholas Kaitschuck
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Neutron activation analysis is not usually known used for environmental radioactivity measurements as compared to low-level passive gamma-ray counting. Texas local background samples were taken as part of a study to compare neutron activation versus passive counting. The benefits and drawbacks of each method are explored for soil samples which are in secular equilibrium, including gamma-ray self-attenuation, sample size and counting times.

Journal of Environmental RadioactivityVol. 289
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
3.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.