Manifold reducibility for a Lagrangian finite element solver with remeshing

• Finite Element solver including large deformation, Lagrangian motion and remeshing. • Standard reduction techniques fail due to the time-evolving mesh structure. • Two novel non-linear reduction strategies to reduce particle-based solution manifolds. • Efficient reduction for given examples, paving the way for PFEM surrogate modeling. Lagrangian solvers are well suited for large deformation fluid problems containing non-trivial mesh distortions. This includes problems with evolving free surfaces, breaking waves, fluid-structure interaction problems, or free-flowing fluids with complex rheology. We focus on the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM). This Lagrangian solver combines the advantages of a particle description of the fluid with a finite element solver and efficient remeshing algorithms. It creates vast data structures of varying sizes as model ouputs. As the mesh varies, regrouping the different fields of interest into a single solution manifold becomes non-trivial. This paper will discuss multiple strategies to reduce a posteriori the solution manifolds formed from PFEM simulations. Data reduction consists in a trade-off between preserving the original data precision and having smaller reduced data sets and is often an important first step towards surrogate models. Two novel mapping-based nonlinear reduction methods will be presented to reduce different high-fidelity PFEM simulations. The data reduction will be made on complete sets of time-dependent simulation snapshots and consists in the separation of space and time with the calculation of space and time modes. We will compare the precision - i.e. the L 2 error of the reconstructed snapshot - the reducibility - i.e. the number of required modes for a given precision in the reduction - and the implementation complexity of the proposed methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.118212
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manifold reducibility for a Lagrangian finite element solver with remeshing

Massimiliano Cremonesi, Max Beckermann, Andrea Barbarulo
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
article

Manifold reducibility for a Lagrangian finite element solver with remeshing

Massimiliano Cremonesi, Max Beckermann, Andrea Barbarulo
article en

Abstract

• Finite Element solver including large deformation, Lagrangian motion and remeshing. • Standard reduction techniques fail due to the time-evolving mesh structure. • Two novel non-linear reduction strategies to reduce particle-based solution manifolds. • Efficient reduction for given examples, paving the way for PFEM surrogate modeling. Lagrangian solvers are well suited for large deformation fluid problems containing non-trivial mesh distortions. This includes problems with evolving free surfaces, breaking waves, fluid-structure interaction problems, or free-flowing fluids with complex rheology. We focus on the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM). This Lagrangian solver combines the advantages of a particle description of the fluid with a finite element solver and efficient remeshing algorithms. It creates vast data structures of varying sizes as model ouputs. As the mesh varies, regrouping the different fields of interest into a single solution manifold becomes non-trivial. This paper will discuss multiple strategies to reduce a posteriori the solution manifolds formed from PFEM simulations. Data reduction consists in a trade-off between preserving the original data precision and having smaller reduced data sets and is often an important first step towards surrogate models. Two novel mapping-based nonlinear reduction methods will be presented to reduce different high-fidelity PFEM simulations. The data reduction will be made on complete sets of time-dependent simulation snapshots and consists in the separation of space and time with the calculation of space and time modes. We will compare the precision - i.e. the L 2 error of the reconstructed snapshot - the reducibility - i.e. the number of required modes for a given precision in the reduction - and the implementation complexity of the proposed methods.

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringVol. 446
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), CentraleSupélec (FR), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.