Barriers to adopting Additive Manufacturing in healthcare: An analysis towards their mitigation

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is transforming healthcare by producing customised and intricate medical devices that were previously impossible to produce using traditional manufacturing systems. However, despite its significant potential, the healthcare industry observes obstacles when deploying AM technologies, which need to be carefully addressed. Our objective is to identify the major barriers, along with their respective intensities and causal relationships, as determined by experts chosen for this study, to facilitate the successful adoption of AM in the healthcare sector. With the help of literature review and experts' opinion, Best Worst Method (BWM) and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), is employed an integrated hybrid MCDM technique, for identifying the intensity and examine the causal relationships of barriers, including four main barriers and their respective fifteen sub-barriers for implementing AM in healthcare. The expert’s opinion and sensitivity analysis finally confirm the robustness and reliability of our framework’s dependability. Based on the results obtained from the BWM method, it can be revealed that “Technical Expertise Shortages” is the most critical barrier. The results obtained through the DEMATEL application identify “Printer and Technology limitations” as the most influencing barrier and “Mechanical Properties Limitations” as the most influenced barrier, which belong to the main barriers “Technical Barriers” and “Material and Design Constraints,” respectively, with barrier “Quality Control Issues” having the maximum number of relationships with other barriers. This research adopts a novel approach to evaluating the barriers to AM in healthcare and their causal relationships, which can help healthcare professionals develop efficient and effective strategies for adopting AM in healthcare. This work may lead to optimal outcomes, resulting in advancements and innovations in the medical field through the adoption of AM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligent Hospital
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inhs.2025.100009
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to adopting Additive Manufacturing in healthcare: An analysis towards their mitigation

Mohd Javaid, Zahid A. Khan, Abid Haleem, S BASHIR et al.
5 citations
Intelligent Hospital
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
3.41
article

Barriers to adopting Additive Manufacturing in healthcare: An analysis towards their mitigation

Mohd Javaid, Zahid A. Khan, Abid Haleem, S BASHIR, Jahangir
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is transforming healthcare by producing customised and intricate medical devices that were previously impossible to produce using traditional manufacturing systems. However, despite its significant potential, the healthcare industry observes obstacles when deploying AM technologies, which need to be carefully addressed. Our objective is to identify the major barriers, along with their respective intensities and causal relationships, as determined by experts chosen for this study, to facilitate the successful adoption of AM in the healthcare sector. With the help of literature review and experts' opinion, Best Worst Method (BWM) and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), is employed an integrated hybrid MCDM technique, for identifying the intensity and examine the causal relationships of barriers, including four main barriers and their respective fifteen sub-barriers for implementing AM in healthcare. The expert’s opinion and sensitivity analysis finally confirm the robustness and reliability of our framework’s dependability. Based on the results obtained from the BWM method, it can be revealed that “Technical Expertise Shortages” is the most critical barrier. The results obtained through the DEMATEL application identify “Printer and Technology limitations” as the most influencing barrier and “Mechanical Properties Limitations” as the most influenced barrier, which belong to the main barriers “Technical Barriers” and “Material and Design Constraints,” respectively, with barrier “Quality Control Issues” having the maximum number of relationships with other barriers. This research adopts a novel approach to evaluating the barriers to AM in healthcare and their causal relationships, which can help healthcare professionals develop efficient and effective strategies for adopting AM in healthcare. This work may lead to optimal outcomes, resulting in advancements and innovations in the medical field through the adoption of AM.

Intelligent HospitalVol. 1(2)
Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
3.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.