Effect of dialysis modality on kidney transplant outcomes in South Africa: a single-centre experience

Background: The effect of dialysis modality on transplant outcomes is disputed, with reduced long-term graft survival in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis reported in some studies. Resource constraints in South Africa limit patient choice of modality, with most state-funded units pursuing a policy of “peritoneal dialysis first”. Application of transplant eligibility as an entrance criterion for dialysis in these settings requires analysis of the effect of modality on transplant outcomes. We therefore undertook the first South African analysis of the effect of antecedent dialysis modality on the development of delayed graft function, rejection and graft function at long-term follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review of all kidney transplants at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2011 was undertaken. Graft outcome parameters (development of delayed graft function, graft function as indicated by eGFR, development of rejection, and graft survival) were compared between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) modalities using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard modelling. Results: Delayed graft function was more frequent in HD than PD recipients (66% versus 34%, P = 0.004); HD increased the odds of DGF independently of donor type (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.46–9.99, P = 0.006). Graft function as indicated by eGFR was comparable between HD and PD subgroups on follow-up. Rejection was numerically more frequent in PD recipients (49% versus 35%, P = 0.135); PD was associated with an increased risk of  rejection over 10-year follow-up (HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.40–7.91, P = 0.007). Overall, graft survival was not dissimilar between dialysis modalities (P = 0.737). Conclusions: Haemodialysis may increase the risk of delayed graft function, possibly due to haemodynamic aberrations associated with this modality, as reported elsewhere. Peritoneal dialysis appears to be associated with increased risk and earlier occurrence of rejection, consistent with previous studies, suggesting accelerated immune reconstitution in this modality. Despite these associations, no effect was observed for dialysis modality on long-term graft function or survival, mirroring previous findings from the developed world.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Nephrology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21804/28-1-6233
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of dialysis modality on kidney transplant outcomes in South Africa: a single-centre experience

1 links
African Journal of Nephrology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Effect of dialysis modality on kidney transplant outcomes in South Africa: a single-centre experience

article en

Abstract

Background: The effect of dialysis modality on transplant outcomes is disputed, with reduced long-term graft survival in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis reported in some studies. Resource constraints in South Africa limit patient choice of modality, with most state-funded units pursuing a policy of “peritoneal dialysis first”. Application of transplant eligibility as an entrance criterion for dialysis in these settings requires analysis of the effect of modality on transplant outcomes. We therefore undertook the first South African analysis of the effect of antecedent dialysis modality on the development of delayed graft function, rejection and graft function at long-term follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review of all kidney transplants at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2011 was undertaken. Graft outcome parameters (development of delayed graft function, graft function as indicated by eGFR, development of rejection, and graft survival) were compared between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) modalities using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard modelling. Results: Delayed graft function was more frequent in HD than PD recipients (66% versus 34%, P = 0.004); HD increased the odds of DGF independently of donor type (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.46–9.99, P = 0.006). Graft function as indicated by eGFR was comparable between HD and PD subgroups on follow-up. Rejection was numerically more frequent in PD recipients (49% versus 35%, P = 0.135); PD was associated with an increased risk of  rejection over 10-year follow-up (HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.40–7.91, P = 0.007). Overall, graft survival was not dissimilar between dialysis modalities (P = 0.737). Conclusions: Haemodialysis may increase the risk of delayed graft function, possibly due to haemodynamic aberrations associated with this modality, as reported elsewhere. Peritoneal dialysis appears to be associated with increased risk and earlier occurrence of rejection, consistent with previous studies, suggesting accelerated immune reconstitution in this modality. Despite these associations, no effect was observed for dialysis modality on long-term graft function or survival, mirroring previous findings from the developed world.

African Journal of NephrologyVol. 28(1)
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.