Mastery and Genericity: Marx, Badiou, Beckett

Abstract: This article develops a reading of the generic in the work of Samuel Beckett, with reference to and in debate with Alain Badiou’s mobilization of this concept in his writings on Beckett. I firstly explore the implicit link Badiou makes between Beckett and Karl Marx, through the concept of “generic humanity.” I then consider Beckett’s Endgame as a work in which the generic serves to problematize all forms of mastery, in the breakdown of the “order” the play’s characters seek to bring to experience, including the experience of death. The article ultimately reads Beckett as an author whose commitment to the generic, as a deformation of the specific differences which underpin order and propriety, ceaselessly transgresses the categories within which it is contained—the generic is both human and inhuman, life and death. This transgression, I argue, is essential to the comedy of Beckett’s writing, which goes unrecognized by Badiou.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
New Literary History
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2025.a966360
Primary Topic
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mastery and Genericity: Marx, Badiou, Beckett

Conall Cash
New Literary History
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
article

Mastery and Genericity: Marx, Badiou, Beckett

Conall Cash
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article develops a reading of the generic in the work of Samuel Beckett, with reference to and in debate with Alain Badiou’s mobilization of this concept in his writings on Beckett. I firstly explore the implicit link Badiou makes between Beckett and Karl Marx, through the concept of “generic humanity.” I then consider Beckett’s Endgame as a work in which the generic serves to problematize all forms of mastery, in the breakdown of the “order” the play’s characters seek to bring to experience, including the experience of death. The article ultimately reads Beckett as an author whose commitment to the generic, as a deformation of the specific differences which underpin order and propriety, ceaselessly transgresses the categories within which it is contained—the generic is both human and inhuman, life and death. This transgression, I argue, is essential to the comedy of Beckett’s writing, which goes unrecognized by Badiou.

New Literary HistoryVol. 56(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.