Silence is golden Disclosure of critical audit matters and auditors' perception of due professional care

Revised auditing standards now require the disclosure of critical audit matters (CAMs) in audit reports. However, these standards do not explicitly specify whether conclusive evaluations should be provided for these matters, leaving it to the discretion of auditors. Our study utilises psychological theories and experimentally tests the impact of CAM disclosure formats (with or without conclusive evaluations) on auditors' perceived due professional care. We find that CAMs with conclusive evaluations lead auditors to perceive a lower level of due professional care compared to CAMs without conclusive evaluations. When considering auditors' experience, our results show that the absence of conclusive evaluations in CAMs leads both less experienced and more experienced auditors to perceive a relatively high level of due professional care. However, the presence of conclusive evaluations in CAMs leads more experienced auditors to perceive a lower level of due professional care compared to their less experienced counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Accounting Auditing and Performance Evaluation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijaape.2025.147098
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silence is golden Disclosure of critical audit matters and auditors' perception of due professional care

Dongmei Han, Yanling Guan
International Journal of Accounting Auditing and Performance Evaluation
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

Silence is golden Disclosure of critical audit matters and auditors' perception of due professional care

Dongmei Han, Yanling Guan
article en

Abstract

Revised auditing standards now require the disclosure of critical audit matters (CAMs) in audit reports. However, these standards do not explicitly specify whether conclusive evaluations should be provided for these matters, leaving it to the discretion of auditors. Our study utilises psychological theories and experimentally tests the impact of CAM disclosure formats (with or without conclusive evaluations) on auditors' perceived due professional care. We find that CAMs with conclusive evaluations lead auditors to perceive a lower level of due professional care compared to CAMs without conclusive evaluations. When considering auditors' experience, our results show that the absence of conclusive evaluations in CAMs leads both less experienced and more experienced auditors to perceive a relatively high level of due professional care. However, the presence of conclusive evaluations in CAMs leads more experienced auditors to perceive a lower level of due professional care compared to their less experienced counterparts.

International Journal of Accounting Auditing and Performance EvaluationVol. 21(5)
Shandong University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Shandong University, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.