Developing Scale for Risk Attitudes in Conditionally Automated Driving: A Sentence Elicitation and Clustering Study

Previous studies on predicting drivers’ proneness to violations and accidents emphasize demographic factors as significant predictors but overlook the link between individual risk preferences and driving safety. Our research aims to develop a scale assessing individuals’ risk attitudes, assuming risk preference is crucial for driving safety, particularly in conditionally automated driving (CAD). As an initial step, following Jian et al.’s (1988) questionnaire development methodology, we conducted a sentence elicitation study. Sentences relevant to risk attitude assessment were extracted from pertinent regulations. Three human factors experts reviewed the sentences, added additional ones, and evaluated them. Some of the evaluated sentences were compared pairwise to construct a dissimilarity matrix. A clustering analysis identified key dimensions of risk preference, forming the foundation for developing risk attitude assessment scale. This scale will help identify high-risk drivers, enabling targeted interventions such as tailored training programs and CAD interface modifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5100/jje.61.2d07-01
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing Scale for Risk Attitudes in Conditionally Automated Driving: A Sentence Elicitation and Clustering Study

Woojin Park, Yejin Kang
The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Developing Scale for Risk Attitudes in Conditionally Automated Driving: A Sentence Elicitation and Clustering Study

Woojin Park, Yejin Kang
article en

Abstract

Previous studies on predicting drivers’ proneness to violations and accidents emphasize demographic factors as significant predictors but overlook the link between individual risk preferences and driving safety. Our research aims to develop a scale assessing individuals’ risk attitudes, assuming risk preference is crucial for driving safety, particularly in conditionally automated driving (CAD). As an initial step, following Jian et al.’s (1988) questionnaire development methodology, we conducted a sentence elicitation study. Sentences relevant to risk attitude assessment were extracted from pertinent regulations. Three human factors experts reviewed the sentences, added additional ones, and evaluated them. Some of the evaluated sentences were compared pairwise to construct a dissimilarity matrix. A clustering analysis identified key dimensions of risk preference, forming the foundation for developing risk attitude assessment scale. This scale will help identify high-risk drivers, enabling targeted interventions such as tailored training programs and CAD interface modifications.

The Japanese Journal of ErgonomicsVol. 61(Supplement)
Seoul National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.