Efficiency of LLM-Based Systematic Review Screening: Mimicking Human Expert Cognition

Systematic reviews (SRs) require extensive effort in literature screening, particularly in abstract selection. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating this process, but existing approaches mainly compare model performances rather than optimizing screening strategies. This study introduces an Expert Imitation Method (Rim's method), designed to replicate the decision-making process of an experienced meta-analysis specialist in oncology. Using structured search queries and keyword-based heuristics, this method improves the efficiency and accuracy of abstract screening compared to conventional PICO- and criteria-based approaches. In validation tests, the Expert Imitation Method achieved superior sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (82.5%) with an AUC-ROC of 0.83. These results indicate that expert-informed prompting enhances the reliability of LLM-assisted SR screening. Future research will refine this method and expand its applications across medical fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5100/jje.61.3c03-01
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency of LLM-Based Systematic Review Screening: Mimicking Human Expert Cognition

Chai Hong Rim
The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Efficiency of LLM-Based Systematic Review Screening: Mimicking Human Expert Cognition

Chai Hong Rim
article en

Abstract

Systematic reviews (SRs) require extensive effort in literature screening, particularly in abstract selection. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating this process, but existing approaches mainly compare model performances rather than optimizing screening strategies. This study introduces an Expert Imitation Method (Rim's method), designed to replicate the decision-making process of an experienced meta-analysis specialist in oncology. Using structured search queries and keyword-based heuristics, this method improves the efficiency and accuracy of abstract screening compared to conventional PICO- and criteria-based approaches. In validation tests, the Expert Imitation Method achieved superior sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (82.5%) with an AUC-ROC of 0.83. These results indicate that expert-informed prompting enhances the reliability of LLM-assisted SR screening. Future research will refine this method and expand its applications across medical fields.

The Japanese Journal of ErgonomicsVol. 61(Supplement)
Korea University Medical Center (KR), Ansan University (KR), Systems Analytics (United States) (US), EP Analytics (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Efficiency of LLM-Based Systematic Review Screening: Mimicking Human Expert Cognition — Chai Hong Rim · The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS