Cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity as moderators of the relationship between group process and pro-migrant collective action intentions

Although group identification, efficacy, and injustice appraisals are well-established predictors of collective action support, contextual factors are rarely examined. We address this oversight in preregistered study by testing whether country-level norms moderate the relationships identity, anger at injustice, and efficacy have with support for pro-immigrant solidarity collective action using data from 22 countries (N = 4615). Given that cultures that emphasize honor and face prioritize harmony and social cohesion over conflict, we expected that honor codes and face orientation would attenuate the links identity, injustice, and efficacy have with collective action support. Results showed that identification, efficacy, and anger at injustice were linked to collective action intentions in most countries, but honor codes attenuated the relationship between anger and collective action intentions. We further discuss the implications and limitations of these results in light of cross-cultural studies of pro-immigrant attitudes and actions. Overall, our findings complement research on predictors of collective action and the dual-chamber model of collective action by presenting potential cultural constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100234
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity as moderators of the relationship between group process and pro-migrant collective action intentions

Danny Osborne, Katherine Stroebe, Ana Urbiola, Göksu Celikkol et al.
Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity as moderators of the relationship between group process and pro-migrant collective action intentions

Danny Osborne, Katherine Stroebe, Ana Urbiola, Göksu Celikkol, Sarah E. Martiny, Michał Olech, Natasza Kosakowska‐Berezecka, Soledad de Lemus, Eugene Y. J. Tee, Angela K.‐Y. Leung, Paweł Jurek, Emma F. Thomas, Sandesh Dhakal, Martijn van Zomeren, Raja Intan Arifah binti Raja Reza Shah, Anna Włodarczyk, Maura Pozzi, Saba Safdar, Dijana Sulejmanović, Tomasz Besta, Gonneke Ton, Carlo Pistoni, Julia C. Becker, Kaltrina Kelmendi, Pravash Kumar Raut, Rie Mizuki, María Chayinska, Gülçin Akbaş, Tymofii Brik, Marek Palace, Özden Melis Uluğ, Anna Kende, Maja Becker, Makiko Deguchi, Paul Le Dornat
article en

Abstract

Although group identification, efficacy, and injustice appraisals are well-established predictors of collective action support, contextual factors are rarely examined. We address this oversight in preregistered study by testing whether country-level norms moderate the relationships identity, anger at injustice, and efficacy have with support for pro-immigrant solidarity collective action using data from 22 countries (N = 4615). Given that cultures that emphasize honor and face prioritize harmony and social cohesion over conflict, we expected that honor codes and face orientation would attenuate the links identity, injustice, and efficacy have with collective action support. Results showed that identification, efficacy, and anger at injustice were linked to collective action intentions in most countries, but honor codes attenuated the relationship between anger and collective action intentions. We further discuss the implications and limitations of these results in light of cross-cultural studies of pro-immigrant attitudes and actions. Overall, our findings complement research on predictors of collective action and the dual-chamber model of collective action by presenting potential cultural constraints.

Current Research in Ecological and Social PsychologyVol. 9
University of Gdańsk (PL), Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.