Towards participatory decision-making under deep uncertainty: benefits and challenges

Decision-making under deep uncertainty (DMDU) provides a set of tools and methods to find resolutions for complex wicked problems, which requires considering multiple actors and uncertainty. However, not all characteristics of wicked problems are typically addressed by the DMDU toolkit. We identified three key shortcomings: the focus on analytical techniques, a lack of attention for sense-making of analytical artefacts with the various parties to a decision, and no attention for coming to a decision. Engaging stakeholders in the DMDU process is a promising direction for overcoming these shortcomings. This study addresses the need for a formalised approach for participatory DMDU. As such, we provide a general structure for participatory DMDU processes and present the potential benefits of engaging stakeholders for each step. We present four challenges in establishing a practice of participatory DMDU: 1) selecting promising projects; 2) designing valuable processes; 3) developing and documenting methods; and 4) evaluating transparently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Policy and Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtpm.2025.147284
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards participatory decision-making under deep uncertainty: benefits and challenges

Melinda A. Novak, Femina Sharu D, Jan H. Kwakkel, Karoline Führer et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Technology Policy and Management
Complex Systems and Decision Making
4.21
article

Towards participatory decision-making under deep uncertainty: benefits and challenges

Melinda A. Novak, Femina Sharu D, Jan H. Kwakkel, Karoline Führer, E.A.J.A. Rouwette, N.A. Hont, Cornelia Els, an Daalen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Decision-making under deep uncertainty (DMDU) provides a set of tools and methods to find resolutions for complex wicked problems, which requires considering multiple actors and uncertainty. However, not all characteristics of wicked problems are typically addressed by the DMDU toolkit. We identified three key shortcomings: the focus on analytical techniques, a lack of attention for sense-making of analytical artefacts with the various parties to a decision, and no attention for coming to a decision. Engaging stakeholders in the DMDU process is a promising direction for overcoming these shortcomings. This study addresses the need for a formalised approach for participatory DMDU. As such, we provide a general structure for participatory DMDU processes and present the potential benefits of engaging stakeholders for each step. We present four challenges in establishing a practice of participatory DMDU: 1) selecting promising projects; 2) designing valuable processes; 3) developing and documenting methods; and 4) evaluating transparently.

International Journal of Technology Policy and ManagementVol. 25(2)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.