Mediatization, Online Spaces, and the Field of Science. The Case of Biblical Studies and YouTube

Drawing on the theory of mediatization and the Bourdieusian interpretation of the field of science, the paper seeks to examine the structure of the field of biblical studies and to assess whether the growing online presence of this research area leads to an internal transformation of the field. This question has serious implications to the autonomy of this segment of the scientific field. After outlining the theoretical framework, the paper discusses how the field of biblical studies is roughly structured: what types of capital do contribute to its structuring, and where the researchers who are active on YouTube are located in the field. This will be followed by an analysis of a few selected biblical studies-focused YouTube channels, which are either run by scholars or interested non-scholars. The paper argues that the online space of YouTube has an ambivalent impact on the scholarly field of biblical studies. It provides a greater spotlight on the one hand to those scholars who do not have the highest scholarly prestige, on the other hand to some scholars on the periphery of the scholarly field, and thirdly to outsiders who represent fringe science views. The analysis shows that these developments have so far had a limited impact on the field of biblical studies. Also, it cannot be said that YouTube channels have only had a negative impact, as learning processes can be observed among the interested youtubers who run them. Keywords: biblical studies, YouTube, field of science, online spaces, mediatization, Bourdieu

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Erdélyi Társadalom
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17177/77171.308
Primary Topic
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mediatization, Online Spaces, and the Field of Science. The Case of Biblical Studies and YouTube

Viktor Berger
2 links
Erdélyi Társadalom
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
article

Mediatization, Online Spaces, and the Field of Science. The Case of Biblical Studies and YouTube

Viktor Berger
article en

Abstract

Drawing on the theory of mediatization and the Bourdieusian interpretation of the field of science, the paper seeks to examine the structure of the field of biblical studies and to assess whether the growing online presence of this research area leads to an internal transformation of the field. This question has serious implications to the autonomy of this segment of the scientific field. After outlining the theoretical framework, the paper discusses how the field of biblical studies is roughly structured: what types of capital do contribute to its structuring, and where the researchers who are active on YouTube are located in the field. This will be followed by an analysis of a few selected biblical studies-focused YouTube channels, which are either run by scholars or interested non-scholars. The paper argues that the online space of YouTube has an ambivalent impact on the scholarly field of biblical studies. It provides a greater spotlight on the one hand to those scholars who do not have the highest scholarly prestige, on the other hand to some scholars on the periphery of the scholarly field, and thirdly to outsiders who represent fringe science views. The analysis shows that these developments have so far had a limited impact on the field of biblical studies. Also, it cannot be said that YouTube channels have only had a negative impact, as learning processes can be observed among the interested youtubers who run them. Keywords: biblical studies, YouTube, field of science, online spaces, mediatization, Bourdieu

Erdélyi TársadalomVol. 23(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.