Exploring professional vision of vet students and tutors: noticing, evaluating and reasoning about practice

In dual vocational education and training (VET) programs, students learn across school and work contexts. Educators in both these contexts reside in different socio-cultural practices and can have different or even contradicting views on practice, influencing their guidance. In this study, we used the concept of professional vision to explore differing views on practice between participants with various educational roles, namely students, school teachers and workplace supervisors. In total, 11 students, 11 school teachers and seven workplace supervisors were asked to view the same set of five videos showing apprentices in the domain of underground infrastructure performing domain-specific tasks. Participants were asked to explain what they noticed in the videos and evaluate the apprentices' performance. The data analysis consisted of a mixed-method approach. We quantitatively compared how educational roles viewed and evaluated task performance, followed by a qualitative ventriloquial analysis of their reasoning. Our findings highlight the diversity in professional vision among participants. Participants focused on different elements of practice, evaluated the same elements differently and showed variations in their reasoning. However, this could only be partly explained by their educational role. These findings suggest a need to prepare VET students for the different views of practice they will encounter during their careers, ultimately forming their well-founded professional vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vocations and Learning
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-025-09375-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring professional vision of vet students and tutors: noticing, evaluating and reasoning about practice

Sietse Brands, Maaike Endedijk, Elwin Savelsbergh, Bas Kollöffel
1 citations
Vocations and Learning
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
11.32
article

Exploring professional vision of vet students and tutors: noticing, evaluating and reasoning about practice

Sietse Brands, Maaike Endedijk, Elwin Savelsbergh, Bas Kollöffel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In dual vocational education and training (VET) programs, students learn across school and work contexts. Educators in both these contexts reside in different socio-cultural practices and can have different or even contradicting views on practice, influencing their guidance. In this study, we used the concept of professional vision to explore differing views on practice between participants with various educational roles, namely students, school teachers and workplace supervisors. In total, 11 students, 11 school teachers and seven workplace supervisors were asked to view the same set of five videos showing apprentices in the domain of underground infrastructure performing domain-specific tasks. Participants were asked to explain what they noticed in the videos and evaluate the apprentices' performance. The data analysis consisted of a mixed-method approach. We quantitatively compared how educational roles viewed and evaluated task performance, followed by a qualitative ventriloquial analysis of their reasoning. Our findings highlight the diversity in professional vision among participants. Participants focused on different elements of practice, evaluated the same elements differently and showed variations in their reasoning. However, this could only be partly explained by their educational role. These findings suggest a need to prepare VET students for the different views of practice they will encounter during their careers, ultimately forming their well-founded professional vision.

Vocations and LearningVol. 18(1)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
11.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.