[Development, reliability and validity testing of Flavor Perception Dysfunction Scale].

<b>Objective:</b> To develop and validate a specialized scale for the diagnosis and evaluation of flavor perception disorders, providing a reference tool for clinical diagnosis and treatment. <b>Methods:</b> The core dimensions of the Flavour Perception Dysfunction Scale were identified, including basic information, type and degree of flavour perception disorder, impact on quality of life, and mental and physical health status. After initial development, the scale underwent expert consultation, with revisions based on feedback. The revised scale was administered to a clinical sample to measure its reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and validity (content validity and structural validity), validating its measurement performance. <b>Results:</b> The scale comprised 40 entries covering 3 sections: basic information, characteristics of flavour perception disorder, and assessment of quality of life impact and psychosomatic health. In 106 clinical samples, the internal consistency test of the scale showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.979, with all dimensions>0.8; the split-half coefficient was 0.872. The content validity assessment showed that the content validity index of the scale reached 1.0 for the entries and 1.0 for both items and the full scale, demonstrating excellent content validity. For structural validity, the KMO test yielded a coefficient of 0.839 by KMO adaptability, and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (P<0.05), supporting factor analysis. T Exploratory factor analysis extracted two factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 87.725%, confirming high reliability and validity. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Flavor Perception Dysfunction Scale demonstrates strong reliability and validity, effectively assessing the severity of flavor perception disorders and their combined physical-psychological impacts. It provides a reliable tool for clinical diagnosis and intervention in flavor perception disorder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241205-00677
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Development, reliability and validity testing of Flavor Perception Dysfunction Scale].

R Q Zhang, Y F Li, J F Liu
1 citations
PubMed
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1.46
article

[Development, reliability and validity testing of Flavor Perception Dysfunction Scale].

R Q Zhang, Y F Li, J F Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To develop and validate a specialized scale for the diagnosis and evaluation of flavor perception disorders, providing a reference tool for clinical diagnosis and treatment. <b>Methods:</b> The core dimensions of the Flavour Perception Dysfunction Scale were identified, including basic information, type and degree of flavour perception disorder, impact on quality of life, and mental and physical health status. After initial development, the scale underwent expert consultation, with revisions based on feedback. The revised scale was administered to a clinical sample to measure its reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and validity (content validity and structural validity), validating its measurement performance. <b>Results:</b> The scale comprised 40 entries covering 3 sections: basic information, characteristics of flavour perception disorder, and assessment of quality of life impact and psychosomatic health. In 106 clinical samples, the internal consistency test of the scale showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.979, with all dimensions>0.8; the split-half coefficient was 0.872. The content validity assessment showed that the content validity index of the scale reached 1.0 for the entries and 1.0 for both items and the full scale, demonstrating excellent content validity. For structural validity, the KMO test yielded a coefficient of 0.839 by KMO adaptability, and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (P<0.05), supporting factor analysis. T Exploratory factor analysis extracted two factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 87.725%, confirming high reliability and validity. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Flavor Perception Dysfunction Scale demonstrates strong reliability and validity, effectively assessing the severity of flavor perception disorders and their combined physical-psychological impacts. It provides a reliable tool for clinical diagnosis and intervention in flavor perception disorder.

PubMedVol. 60(6)
China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CN), Beijing Friendship Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.