A Comparative Analysis of Neural Architecture Search Techniques for Efficient Model Design

This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of four prominent Neural Architecture Search (NAS) techniques—NASNet, AmoebaNet, DARTS, and ProxylessNAS—with a focus on evaluating their effectiveness in designing efficient neural network models. By conducting experiments on the CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets, we assess these methods across several key metrics, including model accuracy, search time, computational cost, and energy consumption. The results reveal significant trade-offs among the techniques, with NASNet achieving the highest accuracy but at the cost of increased computational resources and energy usage. DARTS, on the other hand, demonstrates remarkable efficiency in terms of search time and resource utilization, albeit with a slight reduction in accuracy. This analysis highlights the importance of choosing a NAS method that aligns with the specific needs of the application, whether it be maximizing performance or optimizing for resource constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research
Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33425/3066-1226.1112
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Neural Architecture Search Techniques for Efficient Model Design

P. S. Chaithanya, M Sampoorna, Jangaiah Pothuraju
Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

A Comparative Analysis of Neural Architecture Search Techniques for Efficient Model Design

P. S. Chaithanya, M Sampoorna, Jangaiah Pothuraju
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of four prominent Neural Architecture Search (NAS) techniques—NASNet, AmoebaNet, DARTS, and ProxylessNAS—with a focus on evaluating their effectiveness in designing efficient neural network models. By conducting experiments on the CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets, we assess these methods across several key metrics, including model accuracy, search time, computational cost, and energy consumption. The results reveal significant trade-offs among the techniques, with NASNet achieving the highest accuracy but at the cost of increased computational resources and energy usage. DARTS, on the other hand, demonstrates remarkable efficiency in terms of search time and resource utilization, albeit with a slight reduction in accuracy. This analysis highlights the importance of choosing a NAS method that aligns with the specific needs of the application, whether it be maximizing performance or optimizing for resource constraints.

Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary ResearchVol. 5(3)
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad (IN), Guru Nanak Institutions (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.