Comparing Deep Convolutional Networks and Capsule Networks in Image Classification Tasks

This research compares the performance of Deep Convolutional Networks (DCNs) and Capsule Networks (CapsNets) in image classification tasks, evaluating their accuracy, training time, and inference time across three benchmark datasets: MNIST, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet. DCNs, such as ResNet-50, VGG16, and AlexNet, have established themselves as robust solutions for image classification, excelling in feature extraction and scalability. However, they often exhibit sensitivity to spatial variations due to pooling layers. In contrast, CapsNets, with their novel capsule-based architecture and dynamic routing algorithms, show promise in preserving spatial hierarchies and improving accuracy, particularly in complex datasets. Despite achieving higher accuracy, CapsNets require significantly more computational resources, with longer training and inference times compared to traditional DCNs. This study highlights the trade-offs between the advanced spatial encoding capabilities of CapsNets and the efficiency of established DCN architectures, offering insights into their practical applications and future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33425/3066-1226.1110
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Deep Convolutional Networks and Capsule Networks in Image Classification Tasks

Sreedhar Bhukya, Charan Singh T.
Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Comparing Deep Convolutional Networks and Capsule Networks in Image Classification Tasks

Sreedhar Bhukya, Charan Singh T.
article en

Abstract

This research compares the performance of Deep Convolutional Networks (DCNs) and Capsule Networks (CapsNets) in image classification tasks, evaluating their accuracy, training time, and inference time across three benchmark datasets: MNIST, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet. DCNs, such as ResNet-50, VGG16, and AlexNet, have established themselves as robust solutions for image classification, excelling in feature extraction and scalability. However, they often exhibit sensitivity to spatial variations due to pooling layers. In contrast, CapsNets, with their novel capsule-based architecture and dynamic routing algorithms, show promise in preserving spatial hierarchies and improving accuracy, particularly in complex datasets. Despite achieving higher accuracy, CapsNets require significantly more computational resources, with longer training and inference times compared to traditional DCNs. This study highlights the trade-offs between the advanced spatial encoding capabilities of CapsNets and the efficiency of established DCN architectures, offering insights into their practical applications and future research directions.

Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Deep Convolutional Networks and Capsule Networks in Image Classification Tasks — Sreedhar Bhukya, Charan Singh T. · Global Journal of Engineering Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS