FORMATION OF NATUREINTEGRATED ARCHITECTURE AS A VISUALIZATION OF THEORY OF ARCHITECTURE

The article examines the formation of nature-integrated architecture as a manifestation of the modern stage of development of the theory of architectural space. Scientific approaches to form formation in architecture are analyzed and it is determined how the integration of natural components into architectural objects transforms the spatial organization and interaction of the object with the environment. Key methods of natureintegrated form formation are highlighted, in particular biomorphic modeling, topological plasticity, parametric methods, biophilic design. The dependence between form, function, spatial structure and conceptual foundations of the theory of architectural space are considered. It is determined that nature integration contributes to the formation of new types of architectural expressiveness and strengthens the connection between man, architectural object and environment. Modern scientific approaches to form-making are based on a multi-level understanding of architectural space as a living, changing and interacting system. The latest research is dominated by the ideas of openness, adaptability, dynamism of space, as well as the importance of the relationship between man, the environment and architectural form. Based on modern theoretical concepts of architectural space, key methods that determine the architectural form of natureintegrated architecture were identified: biophilic design, morphogenesis, adaptive form-making, incorporation of natural relief, integration of natural cycles, eco-archetype. These methods not only create aesthetically attractive forms, but also provide ecological efficiency and psychological comfort. Based on this analysis, it was determined that the spatial planning organization of natureintegrated architecture is inextricably linked to theoretical concepts of architectural space. The following theories are considered: space as a dynamic system, space as an element of experience, and space as a communication system. The dependence between space, form and architectural theory is manifested in the fact that the form of an architectural object arises as a result of spatial interaction with the natural context. Space becomes not only a background, but an active factor in design, affecting the function, plasticity and internal logic of the organization of the architectural structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Municipal economy of cities
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-3-191-183-188
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FORMATION OF NATUREINTEGRATED ARCHITECTURE AS A VISUALIZATION OF THEORY OF ARCHITECTURE

Natalya SILVESTROVA, Yuliia Veligotska
Municipal economy of cities
Architecture and Computational Design
article

FORMATION OF NATUREINTEGRATED ARCHITECTURE AS A VISUALIZATION OF THEORY OF ARCHITECTURE

Natalya SILVESTROVA, Yuliia Veligotska
article en

Abstract

The article examines the formation of nature-integrated architecture as a manifestation of the modern stage of development of the theory of architectural space. Scientific approaches to form formation in architecture are analyzed and it is determined how the integration of natural components into architectural objects transforms the spatial organization and interaction of the object with the environment. Key methods of natureintegrated form formation are highlighted, in particular biomorphic modeling, topological plasticity, parametric methods, biophilic design. The dependence between form, function, spatial structure and conceptual foundations of the theory of architectural space are considered. It is determined that nature integration contributes to the formation of new types of architectural expressiveness and strengthens the connection between man, architectural object and environment. Modern scientific approaches to form-making are based on a multi-level understanding of architectural space as a living, changing and interacting system. The latest research is dominated by the ideas of openness, adaptability, dynamism of space, as well as the importance of the relationship between man, the environment and architectural form. Based on modern theoretical concepts of architectural space, key methods that determine the architectural form of natureintegrated architecture were identified: biophilic design, morphogenesis, adaptive form-making, incorporation of natural relief, integration of natural cycles, eco-archetype. These methods not only create aesthetically attractive forms, but also provide ecological efficiency and psychological comfort. Based on this analysis, it was determined that the spatial planning organization of natureintegrated architecture is inextricably linked to theoretical concepts of architectural space. The following theories are considered: space as a dynamic system, space as an element of experience, and space as a communication system. The dependence between space, form and architectural theory is manifested in the fact that the form of an architectural object arises as a result of spatial interaction with the natural context. Space becomes not only a background, but an active factor in design, affecting the function, plasticity and internal logic of the organization of the architectural structure.

Municipal economy of citiesVol. 3(191)
O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Architecture and Computational Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.