Glasgow Coma Score Is Associated with In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Severe Ovarian Cancer

背景:目前,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)在重症卵巢癌中的应用价值尚不明确。方法:从公共重症数据库MIMIC-IV提取重症卵巢癌患者的基线资料、GCS评分和预后情况,以二元logistic回归分析GCS评分是否为院内死亡的独立危险因素。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)以评价GCS评分对于重症监护的卵巢癌患者院内死亡的预测价值。以ROC曲线获得GCS评分最佳截止值进行生存分析,评价GCS对于重症监护的卵巢癌患者院内生存时间的影响。结果:本研究最终纳入145例重症卵巢癌患者,其中27例死亡,118例存活,院内死亡率为18.62%。死亡组的GCS评分显著小于存活组(P 12分)的重症卵巢癌患者的生存时间显著低于低GCS评分患者,其死亡风险约为低GCS评分患者的7倍。Background: Currently, the value of Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) in severe ovarian cancer is still unclear. Methods: Based on the public intensive care database (MIMIC-IV), the baseline data, GCS score and prognosis of patients with severe ovarian cancer were extracted, and binary logistic regression was used to analyze whether the GCS score is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the predictive value of the GCS score for in-hospital mortality of severe ovarian cancer patients. The ROC curve was used to obtain the optimal cut-off value of the GCS score for survival analysis to evaluate the impact of GCS on the in-hospital survival time of severe ovarian cancer patients. Results: This study finally included 145 patients with severe ovarian cancer, of which 27 died and 118 survived. The in-hospital mortality rate was 18.62%. The GCS score of the death group was significantly lower than that of the survival group (P 12 points) is significantly lower than that of patients with low-GCS score, and the risk of death is about 7 times that of patients with low-GCS score.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1572135
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glasgow Coma Score Is Associated with In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Severe Ovarian Cancer

白玉 何
Advances in Clinical Medicine
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

Glasgow Coma Score Is Associated with In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Severe Ovarian Cancer

白玉 何
article en

Abstract

背景:目前,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)在重症卵巢癌中的应用价值尚不明确。方法:从公共重症数据库MIMIC-IV提取重症卵巢癌患者的基线资料、GCS评分和预后情况,以二元logistic回归分析GCS评分是否为院内死亡的独立危险因素。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)以评价GCS评分对于重症监护的卵巢癌患者院内死亡的预测价值。以ROC曲线获得GCS评分最佳截止值进行生存分析,评价GCS对于重症监护的卵巢癌患者院内生存时间的影响。结果:本研究最终纳入145例重症卵巢癌患者,其中27例死亡,118例存活,院内死亡率为18.62%。死亡组的GCS评分显著小于存活组(P 12分)的重症卵巢癌患者的生存时间显著低于低GCS评分患者,其死亡风险约为低GCS评分患者的7倍。Background: Currently, the value of Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) in severe ovarian cancer is still unclear. Methods: Based on the public intensive care database (MIMIC-IV), the baseline data, GCS score and prognosis of patients with severe ovarian cancer were extracted, and binary logistic regression was used to analyze whether the GCS score is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the predictive value of the GCS score for in-hospital mortality of severe ovarian cancer patients. The ROC curve was used to obtain the optimal cut-off value of the GCS score for survival analysis to evaluate the impact of GCS on the in-hospital survival time of severe ovarian cancer patients. Results: This study finally included 145 patients with severe ovarian cancer, of which 27 died and 118 survived. The in-hospital mortality rate was 18.62%. The GCS score of the death group was significantly lower than that of the survival group (P 12 points) is significantly lower than that of patients with low-GCS score, and the risk of death is about 7 times that of patients with low-GCS score.

Advances in Clinical MedicineVol. 15(07)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.